GitLab vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing comparison

GitLab and OpenText are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. GitLab is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. GitLab holds a 11.4% mindshare in DSO, compared to OpenText’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 87 GitLab reviews

17,724 Views
709 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

2,952 Views
531 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and GitLab serve different needs in application security testing and DevOps pipelines. GitLab generally has an advantage due to its extensive features and support, while OpenText offers competitive pricing and strong customer service.

Features: OpenText focuses on automated vulnerability detection, secure code quality, and security enhancements. GitLab integrates CI/CD tools, collaboration capabilities, and extensive repository management, offering a holistic development environment.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance integration features and streamline reporting processes. GitLab might improve on reducing complexity in its feature set and providing more targeted support for smaller teams. Both products can focus on simplifying user interfaces to facilitate ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers robust support with thorough documentation and direct service channels, ensuring smooth deployment. GitLab relies on community support and online resources, which are helpful but may extend deployment times for users unfamiliar with its systems.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText has competitive pricing with lower initial costs, appealing to security-focused organizations. GitLab’s higher cost reflects its comprehensive DevOps features, providing significant ROI for those needing an all-in-one development tool.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in DevSecOps

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd)

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in DevSecOps

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of GitLab is 11.4%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 5.4%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	11.4%
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	5.4%
Other	83.2%

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."

"By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects."

"We use the Git repository and tagging feature. We are a product-based company and use this solution to move to a forward or backward tag."

"As a developer, this solution is useful as a repository holder because most of the POC projects that we have are on GitLab."

"The most valuable aspects of GitLab are the ability to create branches, merge branches, and compare branches to resolve code conflicts."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

More GitLab pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC."

"The solution's technical support was very helpful."

"The accuracy of its scans is great."

"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."

"I'm sorry, but there is no review content provided to extract a quote from."

"The solution is easy to use."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

Cons

"There is a need to improve or adopt AI into the ecosystem like a co-pilot, which Microsoft has done with GitHub."

"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."

"It could have more security integrations and the ability to check the vulnerability of the code. I don't think it is a responsibility of Gitlab, but it would be nice to have more options to integrate with."

"You need to have a good knowledge of the product in order to use it."

"GitLab would be improved with the addition of templates for deployment on local PCs."

"GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would streamline the pipeline and make it more convenient for users."

More GitLab cons

"It requires improvement in terms of scanning. The application scan heavily utilizes the resources of an on-premise server. 32 GB RAM is very high for an enterprise web application."

"The initial setup was complex."

"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."

"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."

"I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker."

"We have had a problem with authentification."

"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."

"The scanner could be better."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The price is okay."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"This solution is very expensive."

"The price is okay."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient. Security-wise, we have security features enabled in GitLab fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 42% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 18% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

SOON DAST vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

October 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

October 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Aaron's

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

September 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.