HCL AppScan and OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing compete in the application security testing category. HCL AppScan appears to have the upper hand due to its faster scan times and superior API support, making it more efficient for quick results.
Features: HCL AppScan offers strong integration with the SDLC, effective XSS and SQL injection detection, and capabilities for agile process integration. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing provides effective web application scanning, detailed report generation, and capabilities for scanning within hybrid environments.
Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could improve its DOM-based XSS detection, reduce false positives, and enhance mobile testing. OpenText should focus on improving report generation speed, prioritize critical vulnerabilities, and consider competitive pricing adjustments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan provides on-premises and cloud deployment but has variable support experiences. OpenText offers on-premises and hybrid deployment with positive feedback on technical support and response times.
Pricing and ROI: Both solutions are perceived as expensive. HCL AppScan offers better integration capabilities that can lead to cost savings and quicker ROI, while OpenText has similar pricing but users report effective vulnerability reduction.
IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
