Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
NetApp Private Storage Logo

Top 10 NetApp Private Storage Alternatives

Vendor: NetApp
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top NetApp Private Storage Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to NetApp Private Storage based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, and Qumulo. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

NetApp Private Storage surpasses its competitors by seamlessly integrating with major cloud providers, offering superior data mobility, and providing robust data protection features that ensure high-performance levels and business continuity.

NetApp Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with NetApp, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
NetApp Private Storage Logo
NetApp Private Storage Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon)
4.4 out of 5
Dell PowerScale offers impressive scalability and seamless data management, appealing to organizations with large-scale storage needs. In comparison, NetApp Private Storage provides strong cloud integration options and flexible storage strategies, catering to businesses prioritizing cloud-centric deployments and interoperability.
Download Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs. NetApp Private Storage Report
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) has a higher initial setup cost, whereas NetApp Private Storage offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) has a higher initial setup cost, whereas NetApp Private Storage offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
NetApp Private Storage Logo
NetApp Private Storage Logo
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
4.2 out of 5
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform offers robust data mobility and high-performance flash capabilities, making it suitable for reliable and scalable needs. In comparison, NetApp Private Storage emphasizes cloud readiness and integrated management, offering a unified storage approach and flexibility in deployment models.
Download Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage Report
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform has low setup costs, while NetApp Private Storage tends to have higher initial expenses. The contrast in setup costs highlights Hitachi's budget-friendly entry compared to NetApp's premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform has low setup costs, while NetApp Private Storage tends to have higher initial expenses. The contrast in setup costs highlights Hitachi's budget-friendly entry compared to NetApp's premium positioning.
NetApp Private Storage Logo
Qumulo
3.9 out of 5
NetApp Private Storage Logo
Qumulo
3.9 out of 5
Qumulo suits agile environments with its real-time analytics and straightforward deployment, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, NetApp Private Storage serves enterprises requiring robust cloud integration and extensive features, despite higher setup costs offering significant long-term ROI potential.
Download NetApp Private Storage vs. Qumulo Report
Qumulo setup costs are low with a straightforward installation process, while NetApp Private Storage incurs higher expenses due to complex setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Qumulo setup costs are low with a straightforward installation process, while NetApp Private Storage incurs higher expenses due to complex setup requirements.
NetApp Private Storage Logo
NetApp Private Storage Logo
Hitachi NAS Platform
3.6 out of 5
Hitachi NAS Platform is favored for its competitive pricing, effective data management, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, NetApp Private Storage appeals with its cloud integration, advanced security features, and superior long-term ROI, despite higher initial costs and a more comprehensive support structure.
Download Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage Report
Hitachi NAS Platform setup cost is higher but offers extensive features, while NetApp Private Storage has lower setup expenses, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Hitachi NAS Platform setup cost is higher but offers extensive features, while NetApp Private Storage has lower setup expenses, appealing to budget-conscious users.
NetApp Private Storage Logo
FreeNAS
4.2 out of 5
NetApp Private Storage Logo
FreeNAS
4.2 out of 5
FreeNAS offers cost advantages and simplicity with open-source flexibility, supporting diverse operating systems. In comparison, NetApp Private Storage, favored for its enterprise features and scalability, appeals to those seeking robust cloud integration and extensive data management capabilities despite the higher price.
Download FreeNAS vs. NetApp Private Storage Report
FreeNAS offers a cost-effective setup, while NetApp Private Storage involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
FreeNAS offers a cost-effective setup, while NetApp Private Storage involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant price difference.
NetApp Private Storage Logo
NetApp Private Storage Logo
QNAP NAS Storage
1 out of 5
NetApp Private Storage excels with hybrid cloud integration and strong data management, suitable for large enterprises. In comparison, QNAP NAS Storage offers versatile applications and intuitive deployment, catering to varied business needs, making it appealing for adaptability and user-friendly features.
NetApp Private Storage generally incurs higher setup costs compared to QNAP NAS Storage, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making the latter a more cost-effective option for users conscious of startup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
NetApp Private Storage generally incurs higher setup costs compared to QNAP NAS Storage, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making the latter a more cost-effective option for users conscious of startup expenses.

Related categories

NAS
File and Object Storage
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)