We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

NetApp Private Storage vs Panasas ActiveStor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: January 2022.
563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable.""Integration with other NetApp solutions and merging them is manageable.""Very stable and very scalable.""NetApp has its own dedicated operating system, so it will not be affected by any wireless piggybacking or malware. That's the beauty of NetApp's operating system."

More NetApp Private Storage Pros →

"We've found the product to be quite flexible."

More Panasas ActiveStor Pros →

Cons
"The hardware does not last as long as it could with new software.""The solution could improve by having better support experts. For example, they do not have clear instructions on configuration.""They need a little more technical people in Akola. Most of the NetApp people are in Bangalore, Mumbai, or Delhi, but there are very few in Akola. I think NetApp has few technicians in Akola because they mostly rely on partners to service this area.""I'm not sure how easy it is to use on the cloud versus on-prem. If they have different user experiences, they should work to make the two as similar as possible to make it easy for a user to understand both even if they only deal mainly with one."

More NetApp Private Storage Cons →

"The solution is quite expensive."

More Panasas ActiveStor Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of NetApp Private Storage is similar to other solutions. There is typically an annual license required for this solution."
  • More NetApp Private Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    NetApp has its own dedicated operating system, so it will not be affected by any wireless piggybacking or malware. That's the beauty of NetApp's operating system.
    Top Answer: 
    NetApp has a standard license that's calculated according to the size of the user base. And if you need additional support, they have Pro support and Pro-Plus support. Pro-Plus support means they will… more »
    Top Answer: 
    If I am using a product in the data center, they will give us a cloud-based DR solution. In the past two years, they have started using that kind of solution as well. We have DR solutions so our data… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We've found the product to be quite flexible.
    Top Answer: 
    The solution could be cheaper. Right now, it's pricey. We don't pay a recurring licensing fee. We just paid for the whole system, including the hardware and software, as well as support and service… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is quite expensive. The solution could offer better support and better local support options.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 27 in NAS
    Views
    548
    Comparisons
    417
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.8
    12th
    out of 27 in NAS
    Views
    290
    Comparisons
    212
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NPS
    ActiveStor
    Learn More
    Overview

    NetApp Private Storage (NPS) for Cloud is a family of enterprise storage solutions that lets you use multiple industry-leading clouds and maintain complete control over your data on dedicated storage systems from NetApp.

    In our most recent product, the ActiveStor Ultra, Panasas has developed a new approach called Dynamic Data Acceleration Technology. It uses a carefully balanced set of HDDs, SATA SSD, NVMe SSD, NVDIMM, and DRAM to provide a combination of excellent performance and low cost per terabyte.

    • HDDs will provide high bandwidth data storage if they are never asked to store anything small and only asked to do large sequential transfers. Therefore, we only store large Component Objects on our low-cost HDDs.

    • SATA SSDs provide cost-effective and highbandwidth storage as a result of not having any seek times, so that’s where we keep our small Component Objects.

    • NVMe SSDs are built for very low latency accesses, so we store all our metadata in a database and keep that database on an NVMe SSD. Metadata accesses are very sensitive to latency, whether it is POSIX metadata for the files being stored or metadata for the internal operations of the OSD.

    • An NVDIMM (a storage class memory device) is the lowest latency type of persistent storage device available, and we use one to store our transaction logs: user data and metadata being written by the application to the OSD, plus our internal metadata. That allows PanFS to provide very low latency commits back to the application.

    • We use the DRAM in each OSD as an extremely low latency cache of the most recently read or written data and metadata.

    To gain the most benefit from the SATA SSD’s performance, we try to keep the SATA SSD about 80% full. If it falls below that, we will (transparently and in the background) pick the smallest Component Objects in the HDD pool and move them to the SSD until it is about 80% full. If the SSD is too full, we will move the largest Component Objects on the SSD to the HDD pool. Every ActiveStor Ultra Storage Node performs this optimization independently and continuously. It’s easy for an ActiveStor Ultra to pick which Component Objects to move, it just needs to look in its local NVMe-based database.

    Offer
    Learn more about NetApp Private Storage
    Learn more about Panasas ActiveStor
    Sample Customers
    ASE IT, Concerto Cloud
    Advanced Mask Technology Center Airbus Argonne National Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas School of Arts Technology and Emerging Communication Башнефть Boeing Bosch California Academy of Sciences Caltech Canon Case Western Reserve University Conoco Phillips Deluxe DirecTV Fairfield Technologies United States Federal Reserve Garvan Institute of Medical Research Goodyear Halliburton Harvard Medical School Honeywell In-Depth Geophysical Intel Kawasaki Lockheed Martin 3M Magseis Fairfield Mammal Studios The Man Group McLaren Mercedes-Benz MINES ParisTech NASA US Navy National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center NBCUniversal National Institutes of Health Nio National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northrup Grumman Novartis Partners Healthcare Procter & Gamble PGS Pratt & Whitney Rutherford Appleton Lab Siemens Sim International Sinopec Solers Square Cnix TGS Toyota Motorsport GMBH Toppan Turner UMass Medical School United Technologies University of Georgia University of California Los Angeles University of Minnesota University of Notre Dame University of California San Diego Center for Microbiome Innovation Whiskytree
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: January 2022.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetApp Private Storage is ranked 8th in NAS with 4 reviews while Panasas ActiveStor is ranked 12th in NAS with 1 review. NetApp Private Storage is rated 8.8, while Panasas ActiveStor is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of NetApp Private Storage writes "Has its own dedicated operating system, so it will not be affected by any wireless piggybacking or malware". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panasas ActiveStor writes "Easy to use and flexible with great performance". NetApp Private Storage is most compared with Qumulo, Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), Hitachi NAS, Buurst SoftNAS and NetApp FAS Series, whereas Panasas ActiveStor is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Sonexion Scale-out Lustre Storage System.

    See our list of best NAS vendors.

    We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.