Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
k6 Open Source Logo

Top 10 k6 Open Source Alternatives

Vendor: k6
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top k6 Open Source Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to k6 Open Source based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Katalon Studio, Apache JMeter, and Tricentis NeoLoad. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

k6 Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with k6, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
k6 Open Source Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
K6 Open Source offers a lean performance testing solution with easy CI/CD integration and no licensing costs. In comparison, Katalon Studio provides an expansive suite for various testing needs, including functional testing, supported by extensive documentation and advanced analytics, appealing to broader testing strategies.
Download Katalon Studio vs. k6 Open Source Report
K6 Open Source incurs no setup cost, while Katalon Studio requires a setup cost making them distinct in economic entry barriers for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
K6 Open Source incurs no setup cost, while Katalon Studio requires a setup cost making them distinct in economic entry barriers for potential users.
k6 Open Source Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Apache JMeter offers robust data handling and extensive protocol support for users requiring complex scenarios. In comparison, k6 Open Source emphasizes efficiency with its modern scripting language and quick deployment, appealing to teams seeking simplicity and ease of cloud integration.
Download Apache JMeter vs. k6 Open Source Report
Apache JMeter involves no initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while k6 Open Source also offers a free-to-use model. JMeter's extensive plugin ecosystem stands out, whereas k6 prioritizes ease of use and modern reporting capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Apache JMeter involves no initial setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while k6 Open Source also offers a free-to-use model. JMeter's extensive plugin ecosystem stands out, whereas k6 prioritizes ease of use and modern reporting capabilities.
k6 Open Source Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad
4.1 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad
4.1 out of 5
Tricentis NeoLoad is favored for its advanced features like real-time performance testing and a robust analytics engine. In comparison, k6 Open Source stands out for simplicity, lower costs, and strong community support, appealing to budget-conscious teams seeking easy deployment and integration with developer tools.
Download Tricentis NeoLoad vs. k6 Open Source Report
Tricentis NeoLoad requires a substantial setup cost, offering advanced features, while k6 Open Source has no setup cost, focusing on ease of use and flexibility. Each product aligns with different budget expectations and performance testing needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis NeoLoad requires a substantial setup cost, offering advanced features, while k6 Open Source has no setup cost, focusing on ease of use and flexibility. Each product aligns with different budget expectations and performance testing needs.
k6 Open Source Logo
BlazeMeter
4.1 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
BlazeMeter
4.1 out of 5
BlazeMeter excels with comprehensive integration support, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, k6 Open Source offers robust developer-centric features for testing within code. BlazeMeter's ease of deployment attracts teams needing strong support, whereas k6 Open Source appeals for its cost-effective, flexible approach.
Download BlazeMeter vs. k6 Open Source Report
BlazeMeter typically involves higher setup costs compared to k6 Open Source, which offers a no-cost setup approach. The significant cost difference highlights k6 Open Source as a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BlazeMeter typically involves higher setup costs compared to k6 Open Source, which offers a no-cost setup approach. The significant cost difference highlights k6 Open Source as a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
k6 Open Source Logo
Selenium HQ
4.0 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
Selenium HQ
4.0 out of 5
K6 Open Source is advantageous for swift deployment and performance testing, offering significant value with no initial cost. In comparison, Selenium HQ suits large-scale automation with extensive language support, appealing to those needing robust scripting flexibility for complex projects.
Download Selenium HQ vs. k6 Open Source Report
k6 Open Source offers low setup costs, making it an attractive option, while Selenium HQ provides a free setup, emphasizing budget-friendliness.
View comparison
Pricing
k6 Open Source offers low setup costs, making it an attractive option, while Selenium HQ provides a free setup, emphasizing budget-friendliness.
k6 Open Source Logo
k6 Open Source Logo
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
4.1 out of 5
k6 Open Source appeals to budget-conscious teams with its flexible, cost-effective solution and easy CI/CD integration. In comparison, OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers high scalability and detailed analytics, making it ideal for enterprises needing extensive performance metrics and comprehensive customer support.
Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. k6 Open Source Report
k6 Open Source has no setup cost, providing a budget-friendly solution, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) involves a setup cost, offering advanced features tailored for larger-scale testing projects.
View comparison
Pricing
k6 Open Source has no setup cost, providing a budget-friendly solution, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) involves a setup cost, offering advanced features tailored for larger-scale testing projects.
k6 Open Source Logo
k6 Open Source Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
4.2 out of 5
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering excels in scalability and comprehensive reporting, making it suitable for detailed analysis needs. In comparison, k6 Open Source offers ease of use and modern scripting, appealing to those seeking streamlined load testing with minimal setup.
Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. k6 Open Source Report
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering involves a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while k6 Open Source offers affordability with its no-cost implementation, drawing a clear distinction in their pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering involves a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive features, while k6 Open Source offers affordability with its no-cost implementation, drawing a clear distinction in their pricing structure.
k6 Open Source Logo
k6 Open Source Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers extensive test management and analytics, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, k6 Open Source excels in performance testing with powerful scripting and CI/CD integration, providing a scalable solution. Both cater to distinct testing needs and budgets.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. k6 Open Source Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite has an upfront setup cost while k6 Open Source offers a lower-cost setup option, highlighting a significant distinction between the two solutions in terms of budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite has an upfront setup cost while k6 Open Source offers a lower-cost setup option, highlighting a significant distinction between the two solutions in terms of budget considerations.
k6 Open Source Logo
RadView WebLOAD
4.1 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
RadView WebLOAD
4.1 out of 5
RadView WebLOAD caters to enterprise-scale operations with robust support and comprehensive analytics. In comparison, k6 Open Source appeals to agile teams with modern scripting and cloud integration. RadView's tiered pricing suits large organizations, whereas k6's low setup costs benefit budget-conscious teams.
Download RadView WebLOAD vs. k6 Open Source Report
RadView WebLOAD requires a significant setup cost, while k6 Open Source has no setup fees, highlighting a key cost-saving advantage for k6 Open Source.
View comparison
Pricing
RadView WebLOAD requires a significant setup cost, while k6 Open Source has no setup fees, highlighting a key cost-saving advantage for k6 Open Source.
k6 Open Source Logo
Akamai CloudTest
3.8 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
Akamai CloudTest
3.8 out of 5
Akamai CloudTest provides strong enterprise-level analytics and monitoring support. In comparison, k6 Open Source offers flexibility and developer-friendly scripting. Akamai suits large enterprises needing comprehensive systems, while k6 attracts agile teams with its lightweight, customizable approach.
Download Akamai CloudTest vs. k6 Open Source Report
Akamai CloudTest involves a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced features, while k6 Open Source offers a cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity and ease of use.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai CloudTest involves a higher setup cost reflecting its advanced features, while k6 Open Source offers a cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity and ease of use.
k6 Open Source Logo
k6 Open Source Logo
SmartBear LoadNinja
3.7 out of 5
k6 Open Source is ideal for teams seeking cost-effective, customizable, open-source environments with scripting prowess. In comparison, LoadNinja offers codeless testing for quicker setup, robust analytics, and structured support, making it suitable for teams prioritizing convenience and formal customer service.
Download SmartBear LoadNinja vs. k6 Open Source Report
k6 Open Source offers a minimal setup cost, ideal for developers focusing on open-source solutions, while SmartBear LoadNinja presents a higher setup cost with advanced features to support broader testing environments.
View comparison
Pricing
k6 Open Source offers a minimal setup cost, ideal for developers focusing on open-source solutions, while SmartBear LoadNinja presents a higher setup cost with advanced features to support broader testing environments.
k6 Open Source Logo
Ixia IxLoad
1 out of 5
k6 Open Source Logo
Ixia IxLoad
1 out of 5
IxLoad provides comprehensive performance tests for validation and user experience (QoE). IxLoad works by emulating web, video, voice, storage, wireless VPN, infrastructure and encapsulation protocols/security to create realistic scenarios. With a modular design, IxLoad scales infrastructure in real time, producing metrics that can quickly identify network impairments and isolate breakpoints.
View comparison

Related categories

Load Testing Tools
Regression Testing Tools
API Testing Tools