We performed a comparison between k6 Open Source and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."
"My company has a good experience with Tricentis NeoLoad, and what I like best about it is that it lets you generate loads from different geographies. The load generation agents getting placed on different geographies is a very good feature of the solution. I also like that you can scale up Tricentis NeoLoad very quickly. The general feedback on performance testing with Tricentis NeoLoad for all product lines within my company is good."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."
"We appreciate that this solution is very user-friendly, even if the user does not have a lot of protocol knowledge and experience."
"There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis."
"The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to execute parallel requests, unlike JMeter and LoadRunner which can only be run sequentially."
"It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing."
"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"It needs improvement with post-production."
"LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."
"Regular and strong support has to be made available by Tricentis during the solution's implementation and initial setup."
"NeoLoad can improve the correlation templates, which are specific to frameworks. There's room for improvement in that area."
"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."
"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself."
k6 Open Source is ranked 17th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 59 reviews. k6 Open Source is rated 7.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of k6 Open Source writes "Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". k6 Open Source is most compared with Apache JMeter, Akamai CloudTest and RadView WebLOAD, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and IBM Rational Performance Tester.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.