Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
InfoScale Logo

Top 10 InfoScale Alternatives

Vendor: InfoScale
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top InfoScale Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to InfoScale based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Windows Server Failover Clustering, DRBD, and DxEnterprise. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

InfoScale surpasses its competitors by offering exceptional scalability, robust data protection, and seamless storage management, ensuring businesses experience enhanced performance, reliability, and flexibility in managing critical workloads across diverse IT environments.

InfoScale Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with InfoScale, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
InfoScale Logo
InfoScale Logo
Windows Server Failover Clustering
4.1 out of 5
Windows Server Failover Clustering offers cost-effective, straightforward deployment with reliable disaster recovery, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, InfoScale's advanced scalability and customization suit enterprises valuing feature-rich environments despite higher costs, thanks to its intelligent workload management and cross-platform support.
Windows Server Failover Clustering offers a more straightforward setup cost, while InfoScale demands a higher initial investment for deployment. Users should consider these contrasting setup expenses when evaluating the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Windows Server Failover Clustering offers a more straightforward setup cost, while InfoScale demands a higher initial investment for deployment. Users should consider these contrasting setup expenses when evaluating the two solutions.
InfoScale Logo
DRBD
4.0 out of 5
InfoScale Logo
DRBD
4.0 out of 5
DRBD offers cost-effective data replication with seamless Linux integration, ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, InfoScale provides robust high availability and disaster recovery features, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive data services and superior customer support. DRBD excels in affordability, while InfoScale caters to complex needs with higher investment.
DRBD often incurs lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while InfoScale may involve higher initial expenses but offers robust features for enterprise-level solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DRBD often incurs lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while InfoScale may involve higher initial expenses but offers robust features for enterprise-level solutions.
InfoScale Logo
DxEnterprise
4.3 out of 5
InfoScale Logo
DxEnterprise
4.3 out of 5
DxEnterprise excels in affordability with efficient support, making it ideal for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, InfoScale attracts those needing comprehensive features and extensive data management capabilities, appealing to businesses prioritizing functionality and willing to invest in robust enterprise solutions.
DxEnterprise has a lower setup cost compared to InfoScale, making it more budget-friendly for initial implementation. InfoScale, however, may justify its higher cost with additional features and capabilities not present in DxEnterprise.
View comparison
Pricing
DxEnterprise has a lower setup cost compared to InfoScale, making it more budget-friendly for initial implementation. InfoScale, however, may justify its higher cost with additional features and capabilities not present in DxEnterprise.
InfoScale Logo
InfoScale Logo
HPE Serviceguard
1 out of 5
HPE Serviceguard provides comprehensive failover capabilities and seamless HP-UX integration, attracting those needing robust scalability. In comparison, InfoScale's advanced data management and storage flexibility make it ideal for diverse systems, appealing to those with specialized requirements and budget constraints.
HPE Serviceguard has a higher setup cost compared to InfoScale. InfoScale's more affordable setup offers a budget-friendly alternative to Serviceguard.
View comparison
Pricing
HPE Serviceguard has a higher setup cost compared to InfoScale. InfoScale's more affordable setup offers a budget-friendly alternative to Serviceguard.
InfoScale Logo
InfoScale Logo
IBM PowerHA System Mirror
4.5 out of 5
IBM PowerHA System Mirror is favored for seamless integration with IBM systems and affordability. In comparison, InfoScale offers advanced scalability and flexibility across various infrastructures, appealing to enterprises needing versatile solutions, despite higher costs that are justified by its extensive capabilities.
IBM PowerHA System Mirror has a straightforward setup cost while InfoScale's setup cost can be more complex and variable, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM PowerHA System Mirror has a straightforward setup cost while InfoScale's setup cost can be more complex and variable, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses.
InfoScale Logo
InfoScale Logo
IBM Platform Computing LSF
1 out of 5
IBM Platform Computing LSF attracts tech buyers with comprehensive workload management and competitive costs. In comparison, InfoScale suits those prioritizing robust application availability and high performance, offering significant ROI despite higher initial expenses, ideal for optimizing application performance and workload management.
IBM Platform Computing LSF offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial cost, whereas InfoScale involves a more intricate and expensive setup phase, highlighting a key distinction in their initial deployment investments.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Platform Computing LSF offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial cost, whereas InfoScale involves a more intricate and expensive setup phase, highlighting a key distinction in their initial deployment investments.

Related categories

High Availability Clustering
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Data Storage for Kubernetes