InfoScale vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Why PeerSpot?

InfoScale and Microsoft are both solutions in the High Availability Clustering category. InfoScale is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #2. InfoScale holds a 20.9% mindshare in HAC, compared to Microsoft’s 14.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfoScale users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

InfoScale

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

2,770 Views
831 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Read 8 Windows Server Failover Clustering reviews

1,130 Views
1,130 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfoScale

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 21, 2026

Windows Server Failover Clustering and InfoScale compete in enhancing system reliability through redundancy. While Windows Server is preferred for its integration with Microsoft products, InfoScale's multi-platform compatibility gives it an edge for diverse infrastructures.

Features: Windows Server Failover Clustering provides high availability, automated failover processes, and seamless integration with Microsoft environments. InfoScale offers cross-platform support, data replication technologies, and storage management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Windows Server Failover Clustering benefits from straightforward deployment in Microsoft ecosystems and offers reliable customer support. InfoScale requires more expertise for setup but provides comprehensive documentation and responsive technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Windows Server Failover Clustering may have higher upfront costs but integrates well with Microsoft licenses, potentially boosting ROI. InfoScale presents competitive pricing and flexible licensing models, offering cost-effective value depending on system requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoScale

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (30th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Data Storage for Kubernetes (3rd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (4th)

Windows Server Failover Clu...

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of InfoScale is 20.9%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 14.6%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfoScale	20.9%
Windows Server Failover Clustering	14.6%
Other	64.5%

High Availability Clustering

Featured Reviews

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

Saad Khoudali

System Administrator at Confidential

A scalable solution to create clusters, and auto-assign a master

The solution has some downsides related to the election mechanism, meaning that if the servers or the cluster services or cluster server elect one server, they will attribute to that server an object that is called a quorum. This quorum does the server or the service that has that quorum, it is taken as the master. So when you have, for example, something happens in your data centers like a power outage or an unexpected shutdown, and you can't start the master server what sometimes will happen, is since the shutdown was unexpected, the cluster didn't have time to do some post configurations before the extension of the shutdown of the servers, sometimes that quorum can't be removed from the crashed master and the cluster wants stuff. This is part of the architecture of this service, the Failover service. So sometimes we face this type of problem. In the past, we had a lot of power outages and when we started after, our server, we faced this problem. Meaning that the cluster won't stop because one of the servers, the master crashed, and they didn't want to start. So we need to access and do some line configurations so that we will force the cluster to elect a new master and ignore the crashed one.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."

"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"From a recovery standpoint, InfoScale is excellent and easy to manage."

"InfoScale's ability to maintain data integrity and availability during a cyber event such as a ransomware attack is excellent."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

"InfoScale does that all by itself without any dependency on different solutions."

More InfoScale pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."

"I would recommend this solution to others, we have used it for a long time and it has been reliable."

"The product is stable."

"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."

"It's scalable, highly available, and is agile to handle workloads."

"Business continuity is much better, due to the possibility of patching/upgrading systems without interruption of services."

"But once it is done, it will perform very well."

"The reliability is pretty good."

More Windows Server Failover Clustering pros

Cons

"Many customers can see the benefit of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to purchase the product because the license cost is very high."

"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

"Many customers can see the benefits of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to buy the products and solutions because of the licensing costs."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is a little higher and should be reduced since most companies cannot afford it."

More InfoScale cons

"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."

"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."

"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."

"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."

"Technical support isn't as responsive as I'd like."

"The tool's pricing is high."

"We are currently looking for another solution because, in many industries, such as eCommerce, they operate 24 hours a day seven days a week and this solution has some downtime which our customers do not like."

"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."

"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."

"We are on an annual license to use this solution."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

University

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

DRBD vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 17% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 15% of the time

DxEnterprise vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 14% of the time

DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 14% of the time

Swarm64 vs Windows Server Failover Clustering

Compared 10% of the time

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale

October 2026

Download InfoScale product report

Buyer's Guide

Windows Server Failover Clustering

October 2026

Windows Server Failover Clustering report

Download Windows Server Failover Clustering product report

Also Known As

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

No data available

Overview

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

InfoScale

Windows Server Failover Clustering is renowned for enhancing server availability and redundancy, offering features like CSVs and cluster role failover, supporting virtual machines and enabling high availability with seamless switchover.

Failover Clustering provides stable, scalable, and highly available systems by allowing users to form clusters using identical servers, ensuring seamless handling of requests. It supports virtualization and can automate master election within a cluster, with geo-redundancy features. While known for its robust functionality, there is room for improvement in technical support and network configuration dependencies. Desired enhancements include better pricing, a simplified hyper-convergence system, and intuitive settings for selecting cluster preferences. Users often integrate it with SQL servers and storage solutions, deploying it for applications requiring high availability.

What are the key features of Windows Server Failover Clustering?

CSV Support: Enables shared storage access across servers, enhancing data availability.
Cluster Role Failover: Automatically shifts roles to ensure continuous service delivery.
Geo-Redundancy: Provides disaster recovery capabilities across geographical locations.
Hot-Swapping: Facilitates hardware replacement without downtime.
Master Election: Automates server hierarchy within clusters for optimal performance.

What benefits should reviewers consider?

Stability and Scalability: Ensures robust server performance under load.
High Availability: Minimizes downtime with automated failover mechanisms.
Virtualization Support: Integrates seamlessly with Hyper-V for enhanced virtual environments.
Cost Efficiency: Offers cost-effective redundancy solutions.

In industries like IT and data management, Windows Server Failover Clustering is vital for maintaining uptime and ensuring data integrity. It plays a crucial role in financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications, where continuous access to critical applications like SQL databases and MySQL is essential. Organizations deploy it to achieve optimal operational continuity and reliability.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart

Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

November 2026

Free Report: InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfoScale vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering report.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.