InfoScale vs Portworx Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

InfoScale and Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) are both solutions in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category. InfoScale is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.5. InfoScale holds a 9.0% mindshare in DSfK, compared to Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)’s 21.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfoScale users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) users who would recommend it.

InfoScale

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

2,083 Views
250 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portworx Enterprise

Read 9 Portworx Enterprise reviews

2,666 Views
1,040 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfoScale

Portworx Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 21, 2026

Portworx Enterprise and InfoScale compete in data management and storage optimization. Portworx holds the upper hand due to its flexibility and support for containerized applications, whereas InfoScale is valued for its feature-rich platform that justifies its higher pricing.

Features: Portworx Enterprise includes seamless integration with cloud-native environments, advanced data resilience, and automated storage operations. InfoScale provides exceptional scalability, comprehensive data protection, and application-aware availability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portworx Enterprise offers a streamlined deployment process and strong customer support, facilitating swift implementation across environments. InfoScale's deployment is more complex due to its comprehensive nature, but it offers thorough support to manage this complexity effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Portworx Enterprise is more affordable, providing a compelling ROI for cost-efficient scalability. InfoScale justifies its higher setup costs with a substantial feature set that ensures long-term returns for extensive data management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed InfoScale vs. Portworx Enterprise Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. Portworx Enterprise

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoScale

Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), High Availability Clustering (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Autonomous Operational Resilience (4th)

Portworx Enterprise

Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes

1st

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Software Defined Storage (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category, the mindshare of InfoScale is 9.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portworx Enterprise is 21.3%, down from 44.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Storage for Kubernetes Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Portworx Enterprise	21.3%
InfoScale	9.0%
Other	69.7%

Data Storage for Kubernetes

Featured Reviews

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

Vishwanath Singh

Senior Engineer 3 at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Data management has become simpler and now supports flexible copies and retention decisions

The best feature is that we have integrated it with Kubernetes. When we have some servers that are going for patching or there is a hardware issue, I can replicate the data into other nodes very easily. I can use some pxctl commands and get the data replicated into other nodes which are healthy. That is the best feature. Managing the data after the initial setup is very easy in Portworx Enterprise. It is also easy to integrate with Kubernetes. We did utilize that functionality. In a disaster recovery scenario, Portworx Enterprise data recovery has been very effective. The only reason why we are moving from Portworx Enterprise to OpenEBS now is because of cost optimizations. I would classify this into two parts: my requirements and my operational efficiencies. My requirements are definitely met by Portworx Enterprise. Once my requirements were met, when I am doing any operational activity, any patching, purging, or any underlying node activities, it is easy for the operational team to manage Portworx Enterprise. They can simply give certain commands, get the underlying data transferred to other nodes, get the data cordoned, and they can take care of the underlying nodes. Portworx Enterprise has been very effective.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"InfoScale does that all by itself without any dependency on different solutions."

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"InfoScale's ability to maintain data integrity and availability during a cyber event such as a ransomware attack is excellent."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."

"It's a stable solution."

More InfoScale pros

"In a disaster recovery scenario, Portworx Enterprise data recovery has been very effective."

"Portworx is a simple solution. It's similar to Pure Storage products. They're all easy to use and install. You need to have a little expertise with containers to use Portworx, but it will be no problem for you if you understand containers."

"Portworx virtualizes the aspects of the underlying block storage. That is good because they can also use block storage for their future deployment instead of just NFS."

"If I containerize a database server, I know that not only is Portworx providing a persistent and resilient storage backend, but it also meets the database's IOPS requirements, in a containerized environment."

"The best thing about Portworx is the Stork, they have called the VPS (Volume Replacement Strategy) and they also have topology awareness, and these are the three features I like."

"Stateful applications are now more resilient and less susceptible to infrastructure-related disruptions, while storage management has become more consistent with our Kubernetes practices, leading to better disaster recovery readiness and faster application deployments."

"A custom IBM script is designed to tackle the storage management challenges within containerized environments, providing crucial data services and features required for enterprise applications."

"I like that you have a small dedicated file system that is fast and resilient for containerized workloads."

More Portworx Enterprise pros

Cons

"It's very difficult to implement."

"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

"Many customers can see the benefit of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to purchase the product because the license cost is very high."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is a little higher and should be reduced since most companies cannot afford it."

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

More InfoScale cons

"I would like to see a more native mapping to mainframe-type systems."

"I think the vendor could provide more training for new users who may not be familiar with containers."

"The integration has room for improvement."

"As far as I know, Portworx Enterprise was a bit expensive when compared to OpenEBS."

"Regarding pricing, I found that a couple of customers did not purchase the project because, at least in Spain, there are customers finding the pricing a little too high for the service they receive."

"It would be highly advantageous to include an integrated backup solution within the same license, rather than purchasing backup separately."

"They have not integrated Portworx with Ondat since they are too focused now on Pure Storage APIs and not on users like us."

"The documentation could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

"The price of Portworx Enterprise is high."

"I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000."

"It has two offerings. One is free, which is limited to only five nodes. The other is enterprise, which is a bit pricier."

"The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Storage for Kubernetes solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portworx Enterprise?

Pricing is good as the functionalities of Portworx Enterprise are explainable. Pricing is bearable, but licensing is a little more complex.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portworx Enterprise?

The only reason why we are moving from Portworx Enterprise to OpenEBS now is because of cost optimizations.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Portworx Enterprise?

I have so much experience in Dynatrace and also I have experience in Grafana and in Kubernetes. Kubernetes is the last one that I have experience with. It has helped greatly. It is very beneficial....

See all answers

Comparisons

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Spectrum Scale vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Portworx Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale

September 2026

Download InfoScale product report

Buyer's Guide

Portworx Enterprise

September 2026

Download Portworx Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

No data available

Overview

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

InfoScale

Portworx Enterprise specializes in security, backup, and disaster recovery for Kubernetes. It offers advanced multi-cluster storage management, enabling seamless migration between on-premises and cloud environments.

Portworx Enterprise provides robust security and management features essential for Kubernetes environments, supporting efficient cross-cluster storage management and facilitating smooth migration between on-premises and cloud platforms. Its resilience and functionality allow users to focus on containerized workloads. Stork and topology awareness enhance usability, complemented by comprehensive documentation for PersistentVolumes and PersistentVolumeClaims implementation. Competing with Rancher's Longhorn, it matches Pure Storage's simplicity.

What features define Portworx Enterprise?

Security: Prioritizes secure data handling and robust disaster recovery.
Autopilot: Automates storage management for efficiency.
Backup and Disaster Recovery: Ensures data resilience and availability.
Multi-cluster Support: Facilitates efficient cross-cluster interactions.
Stork: Enhances operational dynamics and usability.
Volume Replacement Strategy: Increases storage reliability.
Topology Awareness: Optimizes storage placement for performance.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate?

Efficient Migration: Seamlessly transition data across environments without disruption.
Data Locality: Maximizes the accessibility and speed of data.
Enhanced Usability: Improves interaction simplicity and management ease.
Documentation: Provides clear guidance for PersistentVolume integration.
High Satisfaction: Users gain solutions aligning with modern application needs.

Portworx Enterprise is utilized in containerized environments, predominantly in cloud settings with Kubernetes. Users often shift from open-source to enterprise-grade capabilities, benefiting from its efficiency in implementing shared volumes and strong data locality features. Those using dedicated storage for provisioning pure volumes report high satisfaction levels, particularly when exploring modern application settings.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Sample Customers

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart

NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. Portworx Enterprise

August 2026

Free Report: InfoScale vs. Portworx Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale vs. Portworx Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfoScale vs. Portworx Enterprise report.

See our list of best Data Storage for Kubernetes vendors.

We monitor all Data Storage for Kubernetes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.