Top 10 IBM Power Systems Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

4.4 out of 5

72 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top IBM Power Systems Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Power Systems based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge R-Series, HPE ProLiant DL Servers, and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Power Systems surpasses its competitors by delivering exceptional performance, scalability, and reliability, powered by advanced processors designed for high-efficiency workloads, robust security features, and seamless cloud integration tailored for modern business needs.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerEdge R-Series

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge R-Series

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge R-Series prioritizes user-friendly management features and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, IBM Power Systems focus on robust reliability and scalability, appealing to enterprises needing performance despite higher costs. Tech buyers may prefer Dell for budget constraints, while IBM attracts those valuing durability.

Download Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

The Dell PowerEdge R-Series has a lower setup cost, while IBM Power Systems offers a more feature-rich setup at a higher price, highlighting cost-effectiveness versus advanced functionality.

View comparison

Pricing

The Dell PowerEdge R-Series has a lower setup cost, while IBM Power Systems offers a more feature-rich setup at a higher price, highlighting cost-effectiveness versus advanced functionality.

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

4.3 out of 5

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

4.3 out of 5

HPE ProLiant DL Servers excel in scalability, stability, and remote management with competitive pricing, catering to diverse business needs effectively. In comparison, IBM Power Systems deliver advanced performance and reliability, ideal for high-complexity environments requiring substantial processing power and robust virtualization capabilities.

Download HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while IBM Power Systems tend to have higher setup expenses due to their complexity and advanced capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while IBM Power Systems tend to have higher setup expenses due to their complexity and advanced capabilities.

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.3 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.3 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers emphasize energy efficiency and affordability, appealing to budget-focused enterprises. In comparison, IBM Power Systems deliver advanced processing capabilities and reliability, ideal for intensive computing needs. Lenovo offers cost-effective solutions, while IBM ensures substantial long-term ROI with higher upfront costs.

Download IBM Power Systems vs. Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers Report

Pricing

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers have lower setup costs, making them more budget-friendly, while IBM Power Systems involve higher initial expenses, suggesting a more significant investment for enhanced performance and scalability.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers excel in cost efficiency, offering customization and flexibility with simpler installation. In comparison, IBM Power Systems attract those seeking superior performance, scalability, and reliability, despite higher costs and complex deployment, appealing to users needing substantial processing power.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive setup costs, while IBM Power Systems may have higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Cisco.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer competitive setup costs, while IBM Power Systems may have higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost efficiency advantage for Cisco.

HPE Apollo Systems

4.2 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems

4.2 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems are favored for scalability and energy efficiency. In comparison, IBM Power Systems offer exceptional processing power. HPE Apollo is cost-effective and easy to deploy, while IBM provides robust architecture and long-term benefits. Buyers prioritize Apollo's flexibility or Power's superior performance.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems have straightforward setup costs, whereas IBM Power Systems involve more complexity in initial setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems have straightforward setup costs, whereas IBM Power Systems involve more complexity in initial setup expenses.

Intel Server System

3.3 out of 5

Intel Server System

3.3 out of 5

Intel Server System focuses on scalability and cost efficiency, catering to businesses seeking versatile and broad compatibility in diverse workloads. In comparison, IBM Power Systems deliver robust processing power and reliability for data-intensive tasks, appealing to enterprises prioritizing performance and mission-critical operations.

Download IBM Power Systems vs. Intel Server System Report

Pricing

Intel Server System setup cost is competitive and suitable for small to medium businesses, while IBM Power Systems incurs higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities for large enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle SPARC Servers

4.1 out of 5

Oracle SPARC Servers

4.1 out of 5

Oracle SPARC Servers offer security and Java optimization ideal for database tasks. In comparison, IBM Power Systems feature advanced virtualization and manage large workloads efficiently, appealing to those prioritizing flexibility. Oracle attracts with competitive pricing, while IBM draws in enterprises seeking long-term performance.

Download IBM Power Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

Oracle SPARC Servers have a higher setup cost compared to IBM Power Systems, which offer more budget-friendly initial pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle SPARC Servers have a higher setup cost compared to IBM Power Systems, which offer more budget-friendly initial pricing.

Dell PowerEdge XE-Series

4.2 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge XE-Series

4.2 out of 5

IBM Power Systems offer flexibility, reliable virtualization, and dynamic scalability, appealing to enterprises needing robust automation. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge XE-Series shines with impressive storage capacity and security features, catering to data-centric applications and cost-conscious buyers due to its competitive pricing.

Download Dell PowerEdge XE-Series vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

IBM Power Systems setup costs are higher compared to the Dell PowerEdge XE-Series, which offers more competitive pricing. This significant difference can influence decisions for budget-conscious enterprises seeking efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server

1 out of 5

Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server

1 out of 5

KunLun Mission Critical Servers deliver the high reliability, performance, and scalability demanded by the x86 ecosystem and mission-critical environment. It leverages Huawei’s Node Controller (NC) and BMC management chips, and combines the Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) node interconnect technology and RAS 2.0 technology. KunLun supports up to 768 cores on a single server and up to 1.97 scale-up linearity. It has been certified for operating SAP HANA of up to 16 TB for running S4H/SoH applications, and up to 8 TB for running BWoH applications. KunLun delivers industry-leading SAP SD2 and SAP B4H benchmark performance.

View comparison

Related categories

Rack Servers

Converged Infrastructure

Data Center Networking