Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems comparison

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. IBM Power Systems

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Ser...

Ranking in Rack Servers

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Density Optimized Servers (3rd)

IBM Power Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers is 5.6%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Power Systems is 7.0%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Power Systems	7.0%
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers	5.6%
Other	87.4%

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

reviewer1441011

Sr, Manager- Network Solution Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Comprehensive support and integration ensure smooth cloud infrastructure operations

I may not be the right person to comment on advanced improvements because we are just using basic functionalities. We are getting all the functionalities which we used to get in other OEM rack servers. Potential areas for improvement may include a more flexible pricing model, better technical support, or tutorials from the vendor for users.

Read full review

Foluso Jibowo

Product Manager at Hiperdist Ltd

Has empowered enterprises with secure and cost-effective solutions

When discussing disadvantages, I do not see many areas for improvement because we have received good testimonies from every client. IBM gives customers peace of mind. One challenge, which I would not really call a challenge, is that initially people have the notion that IBM Power Systems is quite expensive. However, IBM does not lose deals based on price. This is a message we need to keep communicating to people who feel that IBM is on the high side in terms of cost. We encourage them to have a discussion with us about their total cost of ownership over three or five years. There is a notion in the market that IBM is expensive, which is false. However, once we engage and show them their return on investments and their total cost of ownership savings, they tend to embrace IBM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I really like about the Cisco USC Server is its service profile."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the expansion and replacement of parts."

"The solution has improved our organization by easily integrating with our VMware and storage solutions."

"It is very stable and easy to use."

"It has centralized our server management and allows us to treat servers like a pool of resources instead of discrete devices."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers are agileness, ease of operation, and manageability."

"Its hardware is really reliable. We also like Cisco for its support."

"It is very stable and easy to use. It integrates easily with Cisco's cloud-based UC solutions. There are tools for management that make the management a bit easier, but we don't use them. We don't use what you would term as power users."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers pros

"In terms of the upgrades from previous versions, we definitely see a return on investment, as we get more processor, more CPW, and it's basically the same price."

"We do see ROI from the move from POWER7 to POWER8, as we do capacity management and are able to move quite a lot of workload."

"The stability is beyond belief."

"The performance is the solution's most valuable asset. It has one of the highest levels of performance I have ever seen. It's quite remarkable, in that sense."

"IBM Power Systems is the most stable solution in the world."

"The best features of the solution are its robustness and service level."

"We found working with IBM Power Systems that LPM is the most valuable feature."

"I definitely think that IBM is a market leader in the server sector."

More IBM Power Systems pros

Cons

"This product is quite expensive and it would be better if it were cheaper."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The price of the solution is problematic, not the solution itself. It could be less expensive."

"Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers could improve by adding a wider portfolio because they only have two main categories, the C-220 and 240. There is no wide range of options as other solutions have, such as Dell. Additionally, if it was more flexible with the configuration it would be good."

"There is room for better integration with other brands."

"Some customers have complained about delivery time. So, the main weakness is the lead time."

"Its accessibility and manageability can be improved. Currently, we have to visit the office to manage it. It should be manageable outside our network. I would like it to be on the cloud."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers cons

"It does not offer the ability to run any X86 or X64 Intel architecture-based application on Power Systems. There are a lot of applications, lots of business use cases that do not support this architecture as of now. If somehow application tasks can be ported on to IBM Power Systems, that would be a big improvement."

"I think the cost should be cheaper."

"The scalability process should be simplified."

"I would like to see IBM Power Systems integrate with all cloud types."

"Power Systems' price could always be lower."

"Licensing is always going to be a problem, because it used to be based on, "This is a CPU, this is the memory, this is your footprint." Now, with virtualization, that one CPU can be carved up 100 different ways, so why should I be charged for that use rather than a single CPU, a single socket?"

"The solution could improve the memory database for better integration with SAP HANA."

"Support is good. I think it used to be much better."

More IBM Power Systems cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is slightly more expensive when compared to others."

"This product is quite expensive and it would be better if it were cheaper."

"We have to pay for the VMware and Cisco licenses."

"The pricing is expensive."

"My company has an agreement with Cisco to get discounted rates. It is one of the reasons why we chose the product."

"The price of the solution could be better when compared to other solutions. However, when we purchased the solution we received Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers in a bundle with other hardware, such as IP phones and networking switches."

"The solution requires an annual licensing fee."

"The price of the Cisco UCS C-Series Rack could improve. It's a little more expensive in comparison with Dell or HPE solutions."

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers pricing and cost advice

"Power Systems is very cheap and provides good value for money."

"The licensing costs are okay. With IBM Power Systems, it's inclusive, so you can differentiate the price of the hardware from the software itself."

"The price of IBM Power Systems is expensive and could improve."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"Its price is too high."

"The additional software costs are high."

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and it's an expensive solution."

"The cost model is great. There is so much built in to the technology, that if you know how to use it you can save yourself a lot of money."

More IBM Power Systems pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	42

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

We are running AI on Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers, and we can do it sometimes even without any GPU.

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers?

I would strongly recommend Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers to others.

What needs improvement with IBM Power Systems?

In my opinion, the product can be improved by maintaining it and not sunsetting it; that would be my recommendation for IBM. I used to work for IBM for nineteen years, and I know, unfortunately, I ...

What is your primary use case for IBM Power Systems?

I am an architect and system administrator, and I'm responsible for anything related to IBM Power Systems. In IBM Power Systems, I have found a lot of valuable features such as LVM, TCP, ODM, RSCT,...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Power Systems?

I would recommend IBM Power Systems to others. I have given this review a rating of ten out of ten.

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Comparisons

Compared 42% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 19% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers Competitors

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 24% of the time

Intel Server System vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 21% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 12% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Power Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers product report

IBM Power Systems

Download IBM Power Systems product report

Also Known As

Unified Computing System C-Series, Cisco UCS C-Series

IBM OpenPOWER LC

Overview

UCS C-Series Rack Servers deliver unified computing in an industry-standard form factor to reduce TCO and increase agility. Each server addresses varying workload challenges through a balance of processing, memory, I/O, and internal storage resources.

Cisco

IBM Power Systems are built to crush the most advanced data applications - from the mission-critical workloads you run today to the next generation of AI.

IBM

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Artoni Transporti, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, City of Mississauga, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Kind en Gezin, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Nationwide, Quest, Talbots, University of St. Gallen

Cipher

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. IBM Power Systems