Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GitHub Advanced Security Logo

GitHub Advanced Security Reviews

Vendor: GitHub
4.3 out of 5

What is GitHub Advanced Security?

Featured GitHub Advanced Security reviews

GitHub Advanced Security mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security in the Application Security Tools category stands at 5.8%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub Advanced Security5.8%
SonarQube19.2%
Checkmarx One10.2%
Other64.8%
Application Security Tools

PeerResearch reports based on GitHub Advanced Security reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Security ToolsDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQubeDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub Advanced Security vs VeracodeDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx OneDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
SonarQube4.019.2%83%134 interviewsAdd to research
Snyk4.16.1%100%50 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 7, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business386
Midsize Enterprise252
Large Enterprise1069
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Retailer
6%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Media Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Construction Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare GitHub Advanced Security with alternative products

Learn more about GitHub Advanced Security

Related questions

 
GitHub Advanced Security Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Director, Application Security at Carlsberg4.0I find GitHub Advanced Security beneficial for source code analysis and code scanning within GitHub environments, but it lacks timely updates for open-source vulnerabilities and API security focus. It also has compatibility issues with Microsoft integration, which is surprising.
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0I've used GitHub Advanced Security heavily in software development and found secret scanning and Dependabot helpful, but the code scanning and security dashboard lack clarity, ease of use, and centralized visibility compared to competitors like Checkmarx.
AppSec engineer at EastNets Holding Ltd.4.5I use GitHub Advanced Security for source code scanning due to its customizable rules and seamless integration within my workflow. However, it lacks effective management reporting features. Although I find the cost high, it offers fewer false positives than Veracode.
Delivery Head at Newt4.5I’ve used GitHub Advanced Security for 3-4 years and appreciate its flexibility, Dependabot alerts, and security dashboard, though it could use more customization. Setup was easy, pricing is good, and I've seen time-saving ROI.
DevOps Engineer at Alm Brand4.0I use GitHub Advanced Security at work for detecting code vulnerabilities and secrets. It offers valuable features like copilot auto-fix and custom queries. Improvement is needed in language support and organizational control. We switched from Bitbucket and GitLab due to company policy.
Senior Solution Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees4.0I use GitHub Advanced Security for its focus on code security and CodeQL's reliable findings. While SonarQube emphasizes code quality, both tools complement each other. Improvements are needed in language support and customized rulesetting for better flexibility.
Assistant General Manager at Air India Limited4.5I use GitHub Advanced Security in my company to detect code vulnerabilities while developing web and mobile apps. The deployment process is challenging and needs improvement, especially with clearer guidelines for addressing vulnerabilities, though its reporting capability is useful.
Technical Consultant at Canarys Automations Pvt. Ltd.4.5As a partner, we implement GitHub Advanced Security for SaaS analytics, valuing its dependency and secret scanning features. While CodeQL offers customization, it requires query-writing skills, and training is limited. We switched from multiple products due to partnership benefits.