GitHub vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while GitHub Advanced Security is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.9. GitHub holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub Advanced Security’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub Advanced Security users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,342 Views
1,972 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,308 Views
7,308 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GitHub

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the software development category. GitHub Advanced Security has the upper hand due to its focus on security, providing advanced tools for secure development workflows.

Features: GitHub supports integration with various tools and collaborative features, making it ideal for projects of all sizes. It facilitates community-driven support for open-source projects, GitHub Actions, and effective repository management. GitHub Advanced Security adds value through secret scanning, dependency reviews, and compliance-focused offerings, enhancing secure development capabilities.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could benefit from enhanced project management features, improved integration with external tools, and better handling of large files. Users also call for expanded security measures and integration capabilities. GitHub Advanced Security could improve its customization options, reporting capabilities, and increase support for diverse programming languages.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's cloud-based deployment provides ease of use and excellent community support, although official support can sometimes be lacking. GitHub Advanced Security is adaptable to both public and hybrid cloud environments, with generally satisfactory technical support despite some responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub is cost-effective, offering a free version that many find beneficial, though managing licenses can be challenging. GitHub Advanced Security's higher cost is offset by its enhanced security features that bring a strong ROI due to improved development workflows and reduced security vulnerabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 5.8%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.0%
GitHub Advanced Security	5.8%
Other	93.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Sabna Sainudeen

Director, Application Security at Carlsberg

Seamlessly integrates into developer environment for streamlined code scanning

GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner. There are features in GitHub Advanced Security that cannot be used within Microsoft, which is strange since they are the same company. It should also focus on developing a software bill of materials (SBOM) to see all open software used in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

More GitHub pros

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

More GitHub cons

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"Open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inli...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 42% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 15% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.