GitHub vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while GitHub Advanced Security is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 1.5% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub Advanced Security’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub Advanced Security users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

4,655 Views
2,886 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,051 Views
7,051 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

GitHub

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

GitHub and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the software development and security domain. GitHub Advanced Security has the upper hand due to its specialized security features and integration capabilities, although it's often perceived as expensive.

Features: GitHub is well-regarded for its community support, code management, and integration capabilities, offering seamless collaboration and secure version control. GitHub Advanced Security distinguishes itself with robust security features such as code scanning, dependency checks, and customizable security queries integrated within the development workflow.

Room for Improvement: GitHub can enhance integration with CI/CD tools and its user interface, as well as improve project management and security measures. GitHub Advanced Security could advance its customization options, enhance reporting, and provide better API support while addressing setup complexity and pricing concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is known for easy public cloud deployment and offers various cloud and on-premises options. Community support is strong, though official support is average. GitHub Advanced Security often involves a complex setup preferable for hybrid or on-premises environments, and users report mixed experiences with customer service efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub is considered cost-effective, providing many features for free, favoring small teams or open-source projects. GitHub Advanced Security's high cost is a concern, but its enhanced security and efficiencies provide a good ROI for larger organizations prioritizing code security.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 3.9%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub	1.5%
GitHub Advanced Security	3.9%
Other	94.6%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Devendiran Kandan

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important feature of GitHub is the maintainability of the versions of the code."

"For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment."

"It is really simple to set up."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"GitHub is very straightforward. I really appreciate the versioning capabilities, ease of use, and the ability to host code."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."

More GitHub pros

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"If we have complex branch strategies, it becomes very complicated to manage all those branches."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"If we have complex branch strategies, it becomes very complicated to manage all those branches."

More GitHub cons

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"Open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	50

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub?

When discussing my use case, I don't know which vendors we are working with in that area, as it's not my area of responsibility right now. About six months ago, I was promoted to Software Developme...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?

Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 33% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 7% of the time

GitGuardian Platform vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 2% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

March 2026

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

March 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

March 2026

Free Report: GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.