CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

CrowdStrike and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CrowdStrike is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while GitHub is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. CrowdStrike holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...

Read 32 CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security reviews

13,192 Views
2,375 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,576 Views
7,500 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the cybersecurity category. CrowdStrike has the upper hand in pricing and support, while GitHub is preferred for its feature-rich platform.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security offers real-time threat intelligence, advanced endpoint protection, and comprehensive threat management. GitHub Advanced Security provides seamless integration into development processes, superior code scanning, and proactive security measures.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike could improve intuitive alert management, reporting functionalities, and threat visualization. GitHub could benefit from customizable security scanning rules, streamlined management tools, and enhanced onboarding processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike offers straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive support. GitHub provides developer-friendly setup and easy integration but lacks in user guidance during onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike is praised for transparent pricing and satisfactory ROI. GitHub has higher upfront costs, but its extensive features are considered worth the investment for long-term savings.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (8th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (8th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (8th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (8th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (7th)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 2.5%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub Advanced Security	2.5%
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security	1.3%
Other	96.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Manish Indupuri

senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Provides centralized visibility and real-time threat detection across multiple cloud accounts

Regarding how CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security can be improved, I would say they can improve their support. There were a couple of cases where we needed to escalate issues in order to get proper support. That part could use some tweaking on their end. Additionally, the recent incident during the last summer literally impacted our systems. We had some of our workloads that affected the business, and it was a difficult experience. Apart from that, it is a good tool and the experience with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has been excellent. We did not find any kind of issues, but if they could improve their response to security-related incidents and provide on-time support or better understand our concerns and address them accordingly, it could be very helpful. Regarding needed improvements, I think they should enhance automatic alerting with CI/CD scanning and reporting capabilities. Additionally, it would be better to implement Falcon sensor health monitoring so agents are always active. We could know how it is behaving and how it is treating our environment. That could be a little helpful.

Read full review

Devendiran Kandan

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The immediate mitigation of potential threats and instant alerts are valuable."

"The most valuable features are the real-time response, which allows me to log into a machine to pull files and check signatures for malicious activities, and the ability to restrict USB block storage usage on endpoints by policy."

"The initial setup is easy ."

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has nearly saved us some amount, though I am not exactly sure of the numbers since the sales team handles the financial side, and what we have gained from CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is that EC2 downtime has been prevented and time has been saved considerably, around eight to ten hours per week through automatic onboarding and centralized visibility."

"It's easy to gather insights and conduct analysis about existing threats."

"There is a lot that it can do, but endpoint protection is the main thing about it. The fact that it uses machine learning and artificial intelligence to monitor and remediate the issues in real-time is probably the bread and butter of the product."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The threat detection capability of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has always been the major seller, and it works effectively."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pros

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"GitHub Advanced Security's secret scanning is good."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security could expand into the remediation path."

"I suggest improvements for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security in areas including vulnerability management and a more straightforward agent troubleshooting process."

"The tool could give us more templates so that people who are not updated with the platform can easily get acquainted with how to secure and utilize the product more."

"The file integrity monitoring feature should be enhanced and offered more control"

"There should be cloud storage scanning. We would like to have cloud storage vulnerability and threat management on any cloud storage."

"It would be more convenient if there was an easier way to install CrowdStrike, perhaps through better integration with Active Directory."

"Customers would benefit it CrowdStrike adopted some of SentinelOne's technologies."

"There is room for improvement in the solution's ability to handle Linux systems."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security cons

"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive, but it adds value."

"Its price is moderate."

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is pricy."

"It's an expensive product"

"The pricing is fair for what you get. I'd rate them a solid nine out of ten in terms of pricing."

"It's an expensive package but does what it says it will do."

"The price is not too high, it is okay."

"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very expensive for us. Last month, we had a big issue that took much time and money to resolve. It slowed down our business and required our management team to get involved. We had a problem similar to the "Blue Screen of Death" issue many US companies faced. This incident used up many of our IT resources in just a few months. That's why we're looking for a replacement tool now."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?

In terms of pricing, the setup cost and licensing are comparatively a bit expensive, but the solution's effectiveness and mechanisms justify the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?

I recommend enhancing CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, particularly in the areas of vulnerability management and agent troubleshooting. Improvements in these aspects would help streamline the tro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security for almost three years. My primary use case involves securing endpoints and servers — approximately 6,000 endpoints and over 500 servers running ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?

Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

Wiz vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Competitors

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 11% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

August 2026

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security report

Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

July 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM

No data available

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security helps organizations stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. As CrowdStrike's cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP), it combines real-time cloud detection and response with proactive cloud security to help security teams prevent, detect, investigate, and stop modern cloud attacks.

Industry-leading threat intelligence and AI-powered insights help security teams understand how adversaries operate, uncover evasive threats, and respond with confidence. The result is a stronger cloud security posture, faster investigations, and reduced mean time to detect and respond.

What are CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's key features?

Real-Time Protection: Detects and responds to cloud attacks in real time.
Industry-Leading Adversary Intelligence: Turns intel into prioritized risk and threats.
Cloud Asset Visibility: Discovers and maps assets across the entire cloud estate.
Preemptive Security: Identities risks earlier in development to prevent insecure deployments.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Faster Threat Detection and Response: Achieve up to 89% faster cloud detection and response
Improved Cloud Security Posture: Identify and prioritize high-risk vulnerabilities and misconfigurations faster
Reduce Blind Spots: Gain up to 72% faster ability to monitor the entire cloud estate
Compliance Assurance: Aids in maintaining industry standards.
Return on Investment: 264% Return on Investment over 3 year period

Organizations use Falcon Cloud Security to stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. It helps teams reduce blind spots, focus on the risks most likely to lead to a breach, and detect and respond to attacks faster. By connecting proactive cloud security with real-time detection and response, it strengthens security from development through production.

CrowdStrike

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security

August 2026

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.