Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs Zabbix comparison

Kovai.co and Zabbix are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Kovai.co is ranked #60, while Zabbix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Kovai.co holds a 0.7% mindshare in APM, compared to Zabbix’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kovai.co users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

1,738 Views
904 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 108 Zabbix reviews

24,126 Views
5,066 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Turbo360 are both highly regarded solutions for infrastructure monitoring and management. Zabbix has a strong value proposition in terms of pricing, support, and deployment ease, while Turbo360 stands out with its robust feature set.

Features: Zabbix users value its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including network, server, and application monitoring, along with extensive customization options. Turbo360 users highlight its specialized cloud service monitoring, integration capabilities, and detailed operational insights.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Zabbix can improve its scalability options and simplify its complex configuration process. For Turbo360, feedback indicates a need for enhanced performance metrics and better cost management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix is praised for straightforward deployment in on-premises environments and extensive community support. Turbo360 receives positive feedback for its seamless cloud integration and responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix users benefit from lower setup costs and perceive a high return on investment. Turbo360, while having a higher initial cost, is seen as justifiable due to its advanced features and cloud service advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

60th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

43rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (45th), Cloud Cost Management (31st)

Zabbix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

9th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 2.3%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zabbix	2.3%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	0.7%
Other	97.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1858887

Software Development Engineer In Test at Quinbay

Centralized, great for performing corrective actions and has a helpful Business Activity Monitoring module

1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and a few more Azure services. 3) It would be much better if it is a multi-cloud management/monitoring platform. 4) The consolidated error reports sent via the alerting channels can be a bit more intuitive. 5) Their customer support was good but good technical documentation or feature videos can be even more helpful.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."

"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."

"Zabbix is scalable."

"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."

"The calculations part is the most valuable."

"I have found that the reporting feature in Zabbix is most valuable. Additionally, the solution has given us bandwidth options, we are able to see where problems are. For example, we noticed a problem that occurred because of a bad interface going in the wireless VLAN."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."

"It's the best solution. Great. I would rate the overall solution ten out of ten."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."

"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."

"The reporting is lacking because this is an open-source tool, and nowadays, management's expectation is that the reports should be of high quality and every information should be presented in a concise manner."

"There's a small module of APM, however, it is not an enhanced version. People usually ask for a full-fledged APM solution."

"I would like for this solution to be more cloud-friendly."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"Implementing Zabbix is difficult. I've deployed many solutions over the years, and Zabbix is the hardest to implement. You have to do some development to get it to work with IBM, Micro Focus, or HP products."

"In the next release, I'm hoping for features targeted towards larger users with more customizable options. Despite this, I think pre-canned reports that can be used straight out of the box would be beneficial rather than having to configure each report individually. Additionally, a deeper dive into software configurations on the machines would be useful, although I understand there may be challenges in implementing this due to scripting requirements. More documentation would also be appreciated."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is worth every cent to pay or even study to do your own installation."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"It is open source. If you want to have a subscription or official support, you can pay for it. They have different plans, which are not that expensive. The plans are based on per monitoring server, not per monitored equipment. So, it is not at all expensive, and you can also live without the support if you want a cheaper option."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

"Zabbix is a free solution but the support contact costs money."

"The product is an open source and free solution."

"It is free, which allows us to reduce costs."

"We use the open-source version of Zabbix."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts. I think Zabbix needs to improve the customization better. At present, I am satisfied with the functionality ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 11% of the time

CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 7% of the time

Xosphere vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 8% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

January 2026

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

Serverless360

No data available

Overview

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.

Kovai.co

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix

January 2026

Free Report: Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.