Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs Zabbix comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kovai.co and Zabbix are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Kovai.co is ranked #66, while Zabbix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.9. Kovai.co holds a 0.8% mindshare in APM, compared to Zabbix’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kovai.co users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Zabbix users who would recommend it.

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

5,026 Views
2,161 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zabbix

Read 109 Zabbix reviews

36,835 Views
9,209 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Zabbix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Zabbix and Turbo360 are both highly regarded solutions for infrastructure monitoring and management. Zabbix has a strong value proposition in terms of pricing, support, and deployment ease, while Turbo360 stands out with its robust feature set.

Features: Zabbix users value its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including network, server, and application monitoring, along with extensive customization options. Turbo360 users highlight its specialized cloud service monitoring, integration capabilities, and detailed operational insights.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Zabbix can improve its scalability options and simplify its complex configuration process. For Turbo360, feedback indicates a need for enhanced performance metrics and better cost management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix is praised for straightforward deployment in on-premises environments and extensive community support. Turbo360 receives positive feedback for its seamless cloud integration and responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix users benefit from lower setup costs and perceive a high return on investment. Turbo360, while having a higher initial cost, is seen as justifiable due to its advanced features and cloud service advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

66th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (47th), Cloud Cost Management (32nd)

Zabbix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (1st), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 2.2%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zabbix	2.2%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1868589

Python Engineer at Msys Technologies

Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits

Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications. One more thing to note is that their support team was always ready to clear all our doubts regarding the product but we feel that it would be much appreciated if they could share with us the required resources to get new customers like us well-versed in traversing through different modules of the product. These are the very few areas where Serverless360 can be improved.

Read full review

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"That is exactly where Serverless360 helped us by bringing in both Service Bus management and monitoring under the same hood."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"Serverless360 transformed the way our organizations manage Azure and hybrid integrations."

"The most valuable feature is service assurance."

"I would absolutely recommend Zabbix to others."

"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."

"The monitoring capabilities of the product are excellent."

"This solution is very good for data reporting."

"Zabbix is very easy to implement and the interface is customizable, so we can create the dashboard that we need."

"I like being able to use proxy servers for different locations. The agents are pretty cool. They're easy to roll out. The standard out-of-the-box templates are also pretty easy to use. The integration with other learning products is also good. I have, in the past, used Slack, but we've integrated it with Microsoft Teams. We also use it for SMS with a service called Redcoat. It is very flexible. It does what I need it to do, and my manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything. We are nearing 4,000 hosts inside Zabbix, and we've got another 6,000 access points to add to it. We've thrown everything at it, and it has managed to keep going. I am very impressed with the tool, and I'd shake their hand very hard if I got to say the compliments to the Zabbix team. They keep improving it and doing refreshes, which is one good thing about it. There is also online information as well as books that you can purchase if you're willing to read enough. There is a lot to pick up, but it is a pretty complete solution."

"We have thrown everything at it, and it has managed to keep going, and I am very impressed with the tool, and I would shake their hand very hard if I got to say the compliments to the Zabbix team."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."

"It hasn't really been that stable, but I think that has a lot to do with the specs. It could be more stable."

"The event correlation could be better."

"If you want to use all of the features then you have to pay a licensing fee."

"There are areas of improvement. The database grows really fast. So, when you install Zabbix, you have to deal with some issues, like the database. We become pretty big very fast."

"Overall, setting up Zabbix is a challenge."

"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."

"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is free to use but they offer support as a paid service. If you can go read the manuals and do the fine-tuning based on your needs, you do not need to pay anything and you will have a full solution."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"We use the open-source version of Zabbix."

"We pay the subscription for support by year."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"I use the tool's free version."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

I am using only Area Operations, but I don't prefer it. I installed Zabbix for the 3000 devices. Area Operations is not good.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zabbix?

I am still working with VMware and Area Operations, but I installed Zabbix now. I think Zabbix is better than VMware Area Operations. It's really good. I'm working with both Zabbix and VMware now.

See all answers

Comparisons

CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

Harness vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Buyer's Guide

Zabbix

August 2026

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

Serverless360

No data available

Overview

Turbo360, previously known as Serverless360, provides advanced capabilities for managing distributed systems efficiently, catering to a knowledgeable audience seeking streamlined operations and enhanced performance.

Turbo360 offers a comprehensive suite designed to support businesses in tracking and managing complex distributed applications. It equips professionals with essential tools to simplify the intricate processes of application integration and monitoring, ensuring seamless operational functionality. Targeting a tech-savvy audience, Turbo360 enhances oversight and control over application processes, optimizing resource use and fault detection.

What are the key features of Turbo360?

Integration Tracking: Monitors data flow across applications.
Error Management: Detects and resolves system issues swiftly.
Performance Monitoring: Provides insights into application efficiency.
Resource Optimization: Streamlines resource allocation for better performance.

Why choose Turbo360?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with optimized resource use.
Improved Performance: Enhances application speed and reliability.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with ease.

Industries implementing Turbo360, specifically in finance and healthcare, benefit from its robust tracking and monitoring abilities, improving service delivery and resource management. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for organizations focusing on innovation and digital transformation.

Kovai.co

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Zabbix

Sample Customers

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

Buyer's Guide

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix

September 2026

Free Report: Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix

Find out what your peers are saying about Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs. Zabbix report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.