No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR vs Webroot Managed Detection and Response (MDR) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
9th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Webroot Managed Detection a...
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
96th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webroot Managed Detection and Response (MDR) is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR1.5%
Webroot Managed Detection and Response (MDR)0.2%
Other98.3%
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
 

Featured Reviews

DR
Manager and co founder at Integrita Systems
There is no other vendor we've worked with that has better, more responsive, and comprehensive support
As far as an improvement regarding ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR, there are still some things that, out of the box, it would be nice to have a more fine-grained ability to create certain exclusions. Currently, that is something we have to work on with them when you get an alert, and we can't define or see some of those exclusions on our end. It has to be done in conjunction with them, and it would be nice to have the improvement where we can see those things in our portal or even define some at a very granular level, such as when a particular user is granted remote access to an environment. There were users or new hires that were granted remote access, which then generated an alert from the MDR team. We confirmed that those things were okay, but finding a more granular way to specify that these actions are allowed under very specific circumstances would be beneficial. Again, we are eliminating false positives, but we get very few now anyway since we've been using the product for almost a year.
Use Webroot Managed Detection and Response (MDR)?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR?
The pricing is cost-efficient and provides good value given the level of security enhancement it provides.
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR?
There are still gaps in the EDR when benchmarked against SentinelOne, but it's improving quickly. The ability for ThreatLocker to digest the 365 logs provides an elevated level of 365 protection th...
What is your primary use case for ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR?
Our primary use case for ThreatLocker Cyber Hero MDR ( /products/threatlocker-cyber-hero-mdr-reviews ) is to reinforce a zero trust environment. We utilize it to avoid security faults and improve d...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Information not available
Find out what your peers are saying about Huntress, CrowdStrike, Field Effect and others in Managed Detection and Response (MDR). Updated: February 2026.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.