Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SWIFT InterAct vs webMethods.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SWIFT InterAct
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
webMethods.io
Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of SWIFT InterAct is 3.7%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 11.1%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

VK
Reliability and integration ease enhance messaging efficiency
The most important feature and the reason we use it is the reliability. It's incredibly reliable. We have never experienced any problems worth mentioning. It is quite easy to monitor and check. We are satisfied with the service. While many questions would be better answered by business personnel from the back office, from our perspective, we are satisfied with it. The support for this service is perfect. We frequently have technical questions, not just about future upgrades, and the support is exceptional. We have numerous subsidiaries that can access the case manager on the SWIFT side, and everyone is satisfied with this. The system is straightforward to install and upgrade. It's crucial to upgrade all patches and hotfixes, and the process is quite simple.
MohanPrasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost
webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
60%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
4%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Built.io Flow?
The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.
What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?
webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.
 

Also Known As

InterAct
Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Seceti
Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, SAP, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2025.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.