StarWind HyperConverged Appliance vs SteelFusion comparison

StarWind and Riverbed are both solutions in the HCI category. StarWind is ranked #15 with an average rating of 10.0, while Riverbed is ranked #29. StarWind holds a 1.3% mindshare in HCI, compared to Riverbed’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of StarWind users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Riverbed users who would recommend it.

StarWind HyperConverged App...

Read 66 StarWind HyperConverged Appliance reviews

1,799 Views
1,331 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

SteelFusion

Read 2 SteelFusion reviews

314 Views
301 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StarWind HyperConverged App...

SteelFusion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

SteelFusion and StarWind HyperConverged Appliance are competing solutions in the infrastructure space, each offering unique strengths. SteelFusion excels in features, making it an appealing option for those prioritizing advanced capabilities. StarWind HyperConverged Appliance stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust deployment model, providing high value for investment.

Features: SteelFusion's most valuable features include seamless data mobility, impressive integration capabilities, and strong data security measures. StarWind HyperConverged Appliance offers high-performance storage, simplified virtual environments, and efficient resource utilization. SteelFusion's strength lies in its expansive feature set, while StarWind is noted for streamlined operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StarWind HyperConverged Appliance provides a straightforward deployment model with excellent customer service, emphasizing clear guidance and support throughout the process. SteelFusion, while offering comprehensive support, presents a more complex deployment path that may require additional technical expertise. StarWind's deployment ease and supportive customer service make it a preferred choice for efficient implementation.

Pricing and ROI: SteelFusion involves higher initial setup costs yet promises significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features and functionality. StarWind HyperConverged Appliance offers more accessible pricing, leading to a quicker ROI through its efficient resource management and reduced operational costs. SteelFusion's potential ROI is driven by its robust features, while StarWind provides a faster return with its lower cost structure.

To learn more, read our detailed HCI Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HCI

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

StarWind HyperConverged App...

Ranking in HCI

15th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS) (12th)

SteelFusion

Ranking in HCI

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the HCI category, the mindshare of StarWind HyperConverged Appliance is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SteelFusion is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

HCI Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance	1.3%
SteelFusion	0.6%
Other	98.1%

HCI

Featured Reviews

Russ Le Puill

IT Manager at St Peter's Church of England Aided School

Proactive support with improved speed and resilience

There was a long delay with shipping, which we weren't expecting, but we were kept updated throughout. It wasn't made clear to us that we needed to provide our own SFP modules to connect to our infrastructure, so that could have been a bit clearer. It would be amazing if there was, perhaps, a more automated process for updating the hosts themselves, although the maintenance mode works well. Our StarWind command center doesn't seem to have all the options available currently, which support is investigating for us.

Read full review

it_user866178

Chief Technology Officer at MAZZETTI+GBA

Sync to Central and edge protection mitigate my risk in our branch offices

The level of tech support depends on who you get. There are some techs that just read the script and ask you if you’ve rebooted, but once you get past that - or if you have a very technical issue - the support is great. They really know the product and get you up and running again ASAP.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were able to set it up via the documentation and only needed their support a handful of times."

"The low cost of this solution has also made a big difference in our budget, which has been very helpful."

"With StarWind's Proactive monitoring we can go about our day helping our customers and not have to worry about our cluster's health."

"The option to deploy a hyper-converged system without an expensive storage switch was a benefit."

"StarWind's proactive support is my favorite feature."

"The biggest thing we were looking for was redundancy, with both the compute and the storage, so that way we could lose a full node and still keep everything up and running, and not have to worry about it... StarWind was able to provide a solution for what we wanted, - to provide for redundancy."

"StarWind is very resilient and built off of quality vendor hardware."

"In our experience with StarWind, the support has been by far the most valuable feature."

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance pros

"Sync to Central and edge protection mitigate my risk in our branch offices. All services that need to be local to the user exist on local servers. Users run applications and access data locally while the data is constantly being synced to Central, and protected. If an edge device fails, we can recover quickly."

Cons

"Multi cluster support for their Command Console would be very beneficial. Currently, you can only work with a single cluster at a time. The console is new so I expect much growth in this area in the near future. The other area that could be improved is the tech support locale."

"We ran into some issues with going from Hyper-V 2012 R2 to Hyper-V 2019."

"It would be amazing if there was, perhaps, a more automated process for updating the hosts themselves, although the maintenance mode works well."

"We struggle a little with capacity management with the StarWind Hyperconverged appliance."

"It would be nice if the software told you a new version was available and prompted you to do the upgrade to keep everything up to date."

"At the moment, the initial configuration is very technical and error-prone. That is the reason Starwind does it for you as a service, which is a great thing. But it would be nice if we could change or rearrange storage assignments ourselves."

"I think some performance metrics would be nice to see, especially on the storage side."

"We need to be very cautious in following every step when updating the physical host. We must move over each VM and drain roles from the servers to ensure everything goes smoothly without interruptions. If this were a more automated process, this would be less taxing each time an upgrade is needed."

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance cons

"Setting up disks for use is a multi-step process that could use some refinement. Setting up a core-to-core replication or DR strategy is also cumbersome."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its cost was reasonable."

"We looked at Nutanix and found it did almost the same thing but for more money. In fact, StarWind was nearly one-third of the price; it cost us £36,000. That includes five years of monitoring... The Nutanix was near enough £110,000 for relatively the same amount of performance and storage."

"In terms of cost, a storage array is more expensive... For half the cost of Compellent, I got two hosts, more storage, and redundancy."

"This was all completed at an affordable price point for an SMB, which was also a key element for an NPO."

"We didn't have any issue with pricing or any of the sales process."

"I was able to bring the price per year down by going out to a five-year plan."

"When I researched they came the most cost-effective."

"It's an all in one package, making it very easy."

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance pricing and cost advice

"Price is an issue – this is expensive stuff. My advice is to beat up Riverbed as much as possible on price. These things are expensive and there is room for negotiation."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

18%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Hospitality Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StarWind HyperConverged Appliance?

It's not the cheapest, however, the solution works incredibly well and is so simple to licence and maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with StarWind HyperConverged Appliance?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StarWind HyperConverged Appliance?

We desperately needed to update yet downsize our data centre. We had six hosts for only approximately 14 or so Virtual machines and two old SANs. All of this was running on 10+ year-old refurbished...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

StorMagic SvSAN vs StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

Compared 12% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

Compared 10% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

Compared 9% of the time

VxRail vs StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Local vs StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

Compared 9% of the time

More StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Competitors

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs SteelFusion

Compared 53% of the time

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure vs SteelFusion

Compared 47% of the time

More SteelFusion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance

January 2026

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance report

Download StarWind HyperConverged Appliance product report

Buyer's Guide

HCI

December 2025

Download SteelFusion product report

Overview

For SMB, ROBO and Enterprises, who look to bring in quick deployment and operation simplicity to virtualization workloads and reduce related expenses, our solution is StarWind HyperConverged Appliance (HCA). It unifies commodity servers, disks and flash, hypervisor of choice, StarWind Virtual SAN, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct or VMware Virtual SAN and associated software into a single manageable layer. The HCA supports scale-up by adding disks and flash, and scale-out by adding extra nodes.

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance consists of StarWind Virtual SAN, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct or VMware Virtual SAN “Ready Nodes”, targeting those, who are building their virtualization infrastructure from scratch. In case there is an existing set of servers, we offer a “software only version”, which is essentially our years proven StarWind Virtual SAN. Basically, it’s the fuel powering StarWind HCA.

StarWind

Riverbed SteelFusion is the first and only hyper-converged infrastructure for branch IT, enables 100% consolidation of branch data and servers from remote sites into data centers, delivering complete data security and centralized data protection, without compromising on any of the benefits of running branch services locally for your users. SteelFusion eliminates the need for physical servers, storage and backup infrastructure at branch locations, creates the ability to instantly provision and recover branch services, and provides full visibility and superior performance of on-premises and cloud-based applications, leading to dramatic increases in data security, business continuity, agility and operational efficiency.

Riverbed

Sample Customers

Sears Home and Franchise Business

Roxtec, Engen, Bobst, CBP, IUCN, Mahoning County, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Broadcom, StarWind and others in HCI. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best HCI vendors.

We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.