Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
EDI (2nd), Supply Chain Management Software (8th)
SWIFTnet FIN
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) and SWIFTnet FIN aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) is designed for EDI and holds a mindshare of 14.9%, up 13.3% compared to last year.
SWIFTnet FIN, on the other hand, focuses on Business-to-Business Middleware, holds 4.4% mindshare, down 5.9% since last year.
EDI
Business-to-Business Middleware
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1546587 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, good support, integrates with ShipStation, and has helped reduce our workload
The ability to integrate with ShipStation has been a highlight. It also integrated directly with our ERP/CRM software seamlessly. SPS is intuitive to use and the interface is easy to navigate. We have multiple team members accessing multiple channel accounts within SPS and it could not be more user-friendly. The filters are a great way to get to the data you need.
VK
Reliability and support ensure secure financial messaging over decades
The most valuable feature of SWIFTnet FIN is its reliability. For a bank, reliability is the most critical aspect. We also appreciate the extensive support facilities available worldwide. SWIFTnet FIN's services provide us with reliable connections to entities like European Central Bank, and we plan to join CLS as a direct member through SWIFTnet FIN. The store and forward feature, along with real-time messaging services, are crucial for our operations. Their security measures and compliance with CSP program ensure the highest safety standards. Audits and assessments by companies like KPMG and Ernst & Young further validate SWIFTnet FIN's reliability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which EDI solutions are best for your needs.
865,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
11%
Wholesaler/Distributor
8%
Financial Services Firm
53%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Non Tech Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with SWIFTnet FIN?
While SWIFTnet FIN is a robust system, there is room for minor improvements in scalability and installation complexity. Simplifying installation processes, especially for new users, could enhance i...
What is your primary use case for SWIFTnet FIN?
We use SWIFTnet FIN ( /products/swiftnet-fin-reviews ) for almost everything, including international payments and sending files. It's essential for various financial messaging, such as file act, e...
What advice do you have for others considering SWIFTnet FIN?
Overall, SWIFTnet FIN is a highly reliable system with excellent support and security measures. While it's not perfect in scalability and installation, the system aligns well with our needs. I rate...
 

Also Known As

Fulfillment (EDI), Trading Partner Integration Center
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pet Supplies Plus, Royce Leather, J.R. Watkins Co., Zumba, Deva Concepts, River of Goods, Brooks Sports Inc., Crocs Inc., Redcat Racing, THOS. BAKER, Rugs Direct, WMH Tool Group
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo