• Home
  • IBM B2B Cloud Services vs. SWIFTnet FIN

IBM B2B Cloud Services vs SWIFTnet FIN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM B2B Cloud Services

70 views|56 comparisons
SWIFT Logo

SWIFTnet FIN

Read 1 SWIFTnet FIN review
1,036 views|844 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Cloud Services and SWIFTnet FIN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM B2B Cloud Services?
OleksiiShcherbatiuk
Has strong stability and professional support
Ranking
22nd
out of 27 in Business-to-Business Middleware
Views
70
Comparisons
56
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 27 in Business-to-Business Middleware
Views
1,036
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
IBM
SWIFT
Overview
IBM B2B Cloud Services enable you to connect, collaborate, build, and manage your partner communities. Ranging from on demand to fully managed, these solutions provide you with the flexibility to quickly adapt as business needs change and evolve.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm58%
Computer Software Company9%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise82%
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM B2B Cloud Services is ranked 22nd in Business-to-Business Middleware while SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware. IBM B2B Cloud Services is rated 0.0, while SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". IBM B2B Cloud Services is most compared with , whereas SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.