SpecFlow vs TestRail comparison

Tricentis and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Tricentis is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Tricentis holds a 1.7% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 12.2% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

SpecFlow

Read 4 SpecFlow reviews

272 Views
115 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 22 TestRail reviews

1,937 Views
930 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SpecFlow

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

TestRail and SpecFlow are tools in the software testing and behavior-driven development category. TestRail generally has the upper hand in terms of user satisfaction with features, while SpecFlow is noted for its strong integration and flexibility.

Features: TestRail is appreciated for advanced reporting capabilities, test case management, and seamless integration with other tools. SpecFlow offers strong behavior-driven development support, ease of use in writing and managing tests, and effective Cucumber integration.

Room for Improvement: TestRail could benefit from better performance speed, enhanced search functionalities, and additional automation features. SpecFlow users suggest improvements in documentation, a more intuitive initial setup process, and better community support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestRail is often commended for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. SpecFlow is highlighted for its smooth integration process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support.

Pricing and ROI: TestRail users feel that the tool is fairly priced for the range of features provided and often see a positive ROI. SpecFlow is valued for its cost-effectiveness and the significant productivity boost it gives to development teams.

To learn more, read our detailed SpecFlow vs. TestRail Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow vs. TestRail

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SpecFlow

Ranking in Test Management Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of SpecFlow is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 12.2%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

KreshenAmourdon

Software Automation Test Engineer at I2era

An automation solution with good integration capabilities that needs to focus on providing an option for chain testing to its users

In our company, we need to maintain the scripts of the product daily, and in case of failures, we need to check out the scripts. I would recommend the product to those planning to use it based on both they are planning to build. If you are going for unit testing or small scripts, then you can go with SpecFlow. I don't have much experience with the solution. It is a good and straightforward product. It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."

"One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework."

"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."

"This is a user friendly solution."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."

"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files."

"Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow."

"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool."

"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."

"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."

"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."

"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."

"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."

"SpecFlow is an open-source product."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SpecFlow?

One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SpecFlow?

SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SpecFlow?

In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up migh...

See all answers

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

Pricing is reasonable for TestRail. It offers good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail lacks the functionality to map test cases to requirements and risks. While integration with another tool is a workaround, it doesn't fully meet my needs. Additionally, I would appreciate A...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow

Compared 100% of the time

More SpecFlow Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 22% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 15% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 14% of the time

CucumberStudio vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs TestRail

Compared 6% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow

April 2025

Download SpecFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

April 2025

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

SpecFlow+

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

Tricentis

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow vs. TestRail

April 2025

Free Report: SpecFlow vs. TestRail

Find out what your peers are saying about SpecFlow vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SpecFlow vs. TestRail report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.