SAP Signavio Process Manager vs TIBCO Nimbus Control comparison

"We can use workflow manager to create forms."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"The most valuable feature for me is usability."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager is the ability to do business process models."

"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."

"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."

"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."

"This solution is innovative and simple to use."

"It helps clients find information when they need to know how to do their jobs effectively."

"It tends to get more engagement from people across the business."

"I think the intuitive handling is an issue which they should be more focused on, especially as we have issues with the glossary. If you want to implement Signavio within procedures in contact with other software, it's quite difficult to integrate and you will have several points where you have to double and triple the work, because you cannot maintain the data centrally. With other solutions, we can integrate it and have only one data transfer, to import and export with other solutions. A glossary is still limiting us."

"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."

"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."

"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."

"The licensing model could be better."

"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."

"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."

"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."

"This product could probably do with less features rather than more. It is overly complicated. In recent releases, it has become harder to use."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"We are using the free trial version."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."