Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Jam vs ServiceMax Zinc comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Jam
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (9th)
ServiceMax Zinc
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise PTT (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

SAP Jam and ServiceMax Zinc aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAP Jam is designed for Enterprise Social Software and holds a mindshare of 3.4%, up 3.0% compared to last year.
ServiceMax Zinc, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise PTT, holds 0.6% mindshare.
Enterprise Social Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Jam3.4%
Slack Business - Enterprise11.2%
Microsoft Teams8.4%
Other77.0%
Enterprise Social Software
Enterprise PTT Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ServiceMax Zinc0.6%
Verizon Push to Talk Plus31.4%
Zello29.2%
Other38.8%
Enterprise PTT
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedHaridy - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at Emkan
A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization
It's undoubtedly more complex compared to the initial part. It depends on the requirements. You can't categorically say that HubSpot is only suitable for smaller devices; it's adaptable to various needs. Depending on the requirements, you can have a project completed within as little as six months or as long as a few years. It's a flexible solution that can cater to your specific needs. However, it's essential to start from the beginning, designing the screens and pages within HubSpot. It's somewhat similar to building a website but generally more straightforward to use. You need to input the necessary information based on your specific requirements, and it's not limited to a predefined structure. The team initiates the process with what we term as solution design, but it's more appropriately labeled as enterprise design. This initial phase involves understanding the integration points with other systems and commencing the configuration process. It's essentially the starting point for our analysis. The analysis covers several aspects, including the language requirements, integration tools for interfacing with Java server solutions, and how to effectively use these tools. All these components must seamlessly complement each other. Once the team has everything in place and confirms the tools, they can proceed to elaborate on the specific requirements. The deployment timeline typically ranges from four to six months, specifically for straightforward or standard requirements. However, in the case of a large enterprise organization with numerous legal entities across different countries, each requiring unique interfaces for various purposes, the implementation duration is highly dependent on the specific requirements. It's not feasible to provide a fixed period for such a solution.
Use ServiceMax Zinc?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cotap, Zinc, Zinc Real-Time Communication
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Medtronic, Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Plan International, Sailing Team Germany, Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection, SHORE Solutions Inc., TranSystems Corporation, Day & Zimmerman, Serco Group, Harlequi
Hyatt, Dave's Coffee Company, Citrix, Toray, Scentre Group, Carolina Urology Partners, okta, HealthGrid
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.