We performed a comparison between SafeBreach and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The product gives us a lot of insight."
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."
"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."
More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
SafeBreach is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. SafeBreach is rated 8.0, while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform writes "A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities". SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ and XM Cyber, whereas Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Pentera, Picus Security and AttackIQ.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
