Cymulate vs SafeBreach comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cymulate Logo
3,342 views|2,726 comparisons
SafeBreach Logo
2,058 views|1,163 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cymulate and SafeBreach based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cymulate vs. SafeBreach Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The reporting capabilities are very good.""The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day."

More Cymulate Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods.""The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."

More SafeBreach Pros →

Cons
"The product must provide consultancy for initial setup.""The reporting process requires significant improvement as it often takes longer than expected and the quality is lacking."

More Cymulate Cons →

"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.""There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."

More SafeBreach Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is affordable."
  • "Cymulate's services are expensive."
  • More Cymulate Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
  • "The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
  • More SafeBreach Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature for us is the zero-day.
    Top Answer:Cymulate's services are expensive for CE EU region . In some cases, it may be more cost-effective to hire a local competitor or ethical hacker for a year to perform frequent testing rather than… more »
    Top Answer:The management at Cymulate is inconsistent and unreliable, particularly in the sales process. Changes happen abruptly, with sudden shifts in personnel and strategy. The turnover rate for key… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.
    Top Answer:The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today.
    Top Answer:I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,342
    Comparisons
    2,726
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    765
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    2,058
    Comparisons
    1,163
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    178
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Pentera logo
    Compared 37% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    XM Cyber logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Mandiant Advantage logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Picus Security logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    Pentera logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    AttackIQ logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    XM Cyber logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Verodin logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    For companies that want to manage their security posture against the evolving threat landscape: Cymulate SaaS-based Extended Security Posture Management (XSPM) deploys within an hour, enabling security professionals to continuously challenge, validate and optimize their cyber-security posture end-to-end across the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

    The platform provides out-of-the-box, expert and threat intelligence-led risk assessments that are simple to deploy and use for all maturity levels, and constantly updated. It also provides an open framework to create and automate red and purple teaming by generating penetration scenarious and advanced attack campaigns tailored to their unique environments and security politices. Cymulate allowes professionals to manage, know and control their dynamic environment. 

    SafeBreach is the world's most widely used continuous security validation platform in enterprise companies. The company's patented platform empowers CISOs and their teams to validate security controls, maximize their effectiveness, and drive down risk. 

    SafeBreach provides a "hacker's view" of an enterprise's security posture by continuously validating security controls and presenting findings in customized dashboards to enable stakeholders to cleanly focus on the biggest risk to the organization. SafeBreach automatically and safely executes thousands of attack methods to validate network, endpoint, cloud, container, and email security controls against the Hacker's Playbook, the world's largest collection of attack data broken down by methods, tactics, and threat actors. Data from SafeBreach validations can improve SOC team responses and empower management to make smarter decisions to better manage risk and invest resources.

    Sample Customers
    Euronext, YMCA, Telit, Nemours 
    PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cymulate vs. SafeBreach
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate vs. SafeBreach and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cymulate is ranked 2nd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while SafeBreach is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Cymulate is rated 9.0, while SafeBreach is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cymulate writes "An affordable solution that improves an organization’s security posture and provides excellent reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". Cymulate is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, XM Cyber, AttackIQ and Mandiant Advantage, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Pentera, AttackIQ, XM Cyber and Verodin. See our Cymulate vs. SafeBreach report.

    See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.