Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vs XM Cyber comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
XM Cyber Logo
2,075 views|1,080 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Tenable One Exposure Management Platform and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product gives us a lot of insight.""The solution is very easy to set up."

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Pros →

"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable.""The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."

More XM Cyber Pros →

Cons
"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports.""It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."

More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Cons →

"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.""We'd like to see a cheaper price."

More XM Cyber Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The product gives us a lot of insight.
Top Answer:Access management must be improved. The access manager, security tool, and access control need very big improvements. It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies. For now… more »
Top Answer:The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.
Top Answer:We have to pay standard licensing fees. There are no additional costs. It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
Top Answer:XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas.
Ranking
Views
389
Comparisons
281
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
357
Rating
10.0
Views
2,075
Comparisons
1,080
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
294
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Tenable.ep
Learn More
Overview
You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.

XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company8%
University7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company15%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise61%
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is rated 10.0, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform writes "A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Pentera, Picus Security and AttackIQ, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Tenable Security Center and Picus Security.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.