Ranorex Studio vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."