TestProject [EOL] vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

TestProject [EOL] and Tricentis Tosca are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 71% of TestProject [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis Tosca users who would recommend it.

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

22,489 Views
14,393 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and TestProject compete in the automation testing tool category, with Tricentis Tosca emerging as the superior option due to continuous support and advanced functionality, while TestProject's end-of-life status limits its utility.

Features: Tricentis Tosca is renowned for advanced automation with model-based testing, scriptless automation, and robust mobile testing support. It offers intuitive drag-and-drop functionality, simplifying test case creation. TestProject once provided scriptless automation and valuable integrations, but its discontinued status has curtailed its relevance.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca faces challenges with upgrades affecting integrations, and its UI dependency can slow web application performance. TestProject required better platform integration support and faced declines in community and user support upon transitioning from free to commercial services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers diverse deployment modes including Hybrid Cloud, On-premises, and Public Cloud, with 24/5 expert support. TestProject was limited to On-premises and Public Cloud, and exhibited diminished support quality post-transition, affecting timely query resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is a high-cost tool justified by its features, offering significant ROI for large enterprises, though less feasible for smaller businesses. TestProject shifted from a free model to having costs, losing its initial cost advantage.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"Tosca lets you jot down your requirements, design test cases, automate and analyse your test results within one GUI."

"It's been very helpful to have connectivity with mobile. The tool also identifies some of the actual changes from the recordings on the actual testing suite. That is something that I really like."

"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."

"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."

"From the commercial tool perspective, Tosca is a leader in every aspect."

"It allows manual testers to pick up automation, because it is a scriptless tool."

"Compared to the old tools, WinRunner and TestDirector by Mercury Interactive, it accelerated building, performing, and maintaining regression tests by a factor of approximately ten times."

"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"A company would not be able to scale with just this solution."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"Technical support is an area they need to work on, they are too slow to resolve issues."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

"Exploratory testing engine needs improved element recognition (at lease in JAVA Swing)"

"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."

"The product needs to improve its pricing. It also needs to improve the infrastructure and DEX agent setup."

"At the time I was using the product, the reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."

"The technical support services are generally good, though there are areas for improvement regarding response time and overall competence."

"The product needs to improve object identification. The identify with properties and anchor methods work perfectly, while the by-index and image methods may face challenges."

"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"There is an annual cost for Tricentis."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"Tosca is expensive. I don't see small and medium customers going for it. It's always large enterprises that have a big pocket. It is very expensive as compared to the other tools that we have in the market. They should reduce the price by half, and if they do that, they would do better business. From the competition perspective, other solutions are at a pretty similar level. UiPath is also very expensive. One thing that I always wanted was a short-term consumption license. With Tricentis, the biggest challenge is that you have to go for a minimum of one year license, and they also try to sell you a three-year license. It would be good if people can get a three-month or four-month consumption license."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 37% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 31% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

July 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

July 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.