Qlik Compose vs SnapLogic comparison

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

3,763 Views
2,032 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SnapLogic and Qlik Compose are competitive products in data integration and management. While SnapLogic is favored for its flexible integration capabilities, Qlik Compose stands out with its rich feature set, making it a preferred choice for comprehensive data solutions.

Features: SnapLogic is renowned for its dynamic data pipeline capabilities, integration tools catering to diverse protocols, and low-code development features. It supports a wide range of third-party connectivity through SAP, Salesforce, and Workday Snap Packs. Qlik Compose offers robust data transformation, data warehouse automation, and real-time replication features. It also provides tools like CDC training and managed Data Lake Creation, adding value to analytics applications.

Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could enhance its dashboard's intuitiveness and improve support for complex data modeling. It might also benefit from more comprehensive documentation and advanced tutorial resources. Qlik Compose could improve its initial deployment complexity and enhance user interface design to be more intuitive for beginners. It may also benefit from expanding its real-time analytics capabilities and flexibility in integration across varied platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic delivers a cloud-based platform known for smooth deployments and prompt customer support, allowing quick setup and problem resolution. In contrast, Qlik Compose follows a more traditional deployment model, which can be complex but is supported with thorough documentation and extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic offers lower initial setup costs with scalable pricing models, ensuring a favorable return on investment. Despite higher initial expenses, Qlik Compose promises significant ROI with its rich feature set, justifying the cost for those seeking comprehensive data integration solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: August 2025).

Qlik Compose vs. SnapLogic

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SnapLogic

Ranking in Data Integration

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (15th), Cloud Data Integration (14th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"It's a stable solution."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"It is a scalable solution."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

More Qlik Compose pros

"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."

"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."

"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."

"The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten."

"I found SnapLogic valuable and what I found most valuable about it was its ETL feature. I also found its automation feature valuable. It can be used for automating manual activities. It can be used as a middleware for certain transactional data processing and minimal datasets and ETL activities."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"There could be more customization options."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

More Qlik Compose cons

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."

"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."

"I am looking for more scheduling options. When it comes to scheduling, there are different tools in the market."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

"I used the free trial."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 14% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SnapLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download Qlik Compose product report

Qlik Compose

August 2025

Download SnapLogic product report

July 2025

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

DataFlow

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!