

Proofpoint Email Protection and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform are both strong competitors in the cybersecurity space, offering solutions to protect against different types of cyber threats. Proofpoint holds an advantage in phishing detection and email spam filtering, focusing on securing organizational email communication. ThreatLocker excels in application control and endpoint protection, emphasizing a zero-trust approach to prevent unauthorized access.
Features: Proofpoint Email Protection is known for phishing protection, granular email controls, and seamless integration with security tools such as SIEM, enhancing email security and threat filtering. It offers user vulnerability metrics to strengthen organizational security awareness. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform provides granular application control, strict deny-by-default policies, and Ring-Fencing technology to prevent unauthorized access, offering comprehensive endpoint security management for software and device access.
Room for Improvement: Proofpoint Email Protection requires modernizing its interface, improving support response times, and expanding log retention. Better AI integration and cost-effectiveness are also desired by users. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform could enhance identity verification, improve compatibility with mobile and Apple ecosystems, and offer more robust SIEM tool integrations. Both platforms face challenges with pricing and tech stack integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Proofpoint Email Protection is often deployed in public and hybrid cloud environments, with mixed reviews regarding setup complexity. Despite its security effectiveness, customer service varies, with reports of delayed support. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers more flexible deployment options in cloud and on-prem environments, generally recognized for quick support responses, aiding smoother integration.
Pricing and ROI: Proofpoint Email Protection is a premium-priced solution with extensive email security capabilities, justifying ROI through reduced incidents and increased operational efficiency, despite being costlier than some competitors. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers competitive pricing and a cost-effective licensing structure, delivering value via comprehensive endpoint protection with minimal upfront investment, both yielding significant ROI in security enhancements.
The ideal situation would be to have all these portals combined into one unified dashboard.
The time required for email investigations and responses has changed with Proofpoint Email Protection's visibility and automation.
If you implement these kinds of solutions in your security stack, the first beneficial thing will be that you will not suffer any malware, and you will not face attacks, which ultimately leads to financial benefit.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
I am familiar with the granular policy control feature of Proofpoint Email Protection, and I find their support excellent for modifying those policies.
Even the engineers have been helpful, and if we open a case, they get back to us right away.
We always contact them if we need support, whether it's for setting up features or technical support, which is very responsive.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
Proofpoint is scalable for multi-site organizations with thousands of users.
The solution provides a graphical representation and dashboard view showing how many threats are getting blocked on a daily and monthly basis.
Proofpoint Email Protection is considered to be highly scalable, designed for large enterprises, with a cloud-based architecture that offers an enormous number of options, including multi-organization support and high-volume email handling.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
If Proofpoint Email Protection has an outage, we are either not receiving emails or not blocking the right threats.
Regarding the stability and performance of Proofpoint Email Protection, I have not experienced any crashes, downtimes, or performance issues.
Proofpoint Email Protection is very stable and reliable, as it remains accessible at all times without issues, ensuring that data is available in real time.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
The older legacy user interface just took a little to work with, and the new unified interface, as it was able to do more and more of the functionality of the old one, the product just got easier and easier to use.
In addition to the UI improvements, I would appreciate an increase in the speed of the tasks being processed on the pod.
There are pros and cons to that, but I would suggest maintaining a good balance between security protection and operational impact.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
Customers pay around $90,000 yearly for a 1,000-user organization, with the subscription license being the main expense, apart from implementation fees.
Given my other experience with other vendors, I think they are a bit on the high end and a bit on the pricey end for the email security functionality that we were using.
Although it is a bit costly compared to Mimecast, Defender, and Cofense Vision, it is efficient and strong in security, so I do not mind the cost because I will not reduce my security risk.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
Without Proofpoint Email Protection, most of these emails would have come through, slipped through Exchange, gotten into the user's mailbox, and created a lot of trouble for the organization.
Proofpoint Email Protection has positively impacted my organization by ensuring we are not at risk of a breach through email.
TAP alerts, where Proofpoint Email Protection scans emails and sends alerts, provide the ability to review suspicious emails and validate them in a sandbox environment.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Proofpoint Email Protection | 5.3% |
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 2.6% |
| Other | 92.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Proofpoint Email Protection provides powerful filtering against spam, phishing, and malware, leveraging effective threat detection and blocking capabilities. This solution integrates smoothly with platforms like Office 365, offering a user-friendly dashboard for seamless operations.
Proofpoint Email Protection focuses on email security, ensuring protection against phishing, malware, and spam. It includes features like URL scanning, anti-phishing, anti-virus protection, and sandboxing for comprehensive threat analysis. Its advanced analytics through TAP and TRAP, along with strong integration abilities, make it appealing for handling email threats. While scalability and ease of deployment are advantages, challenges such as integration in complex environments, the cost, and limited local support require attention. Enhancements in search functionality, email encryption, and improved phishing detection are also needed.
What are the key features of Proofpoint Email Protection?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Industries adopting Proofpoint Email Protection include finance, healthcare, and education sectors, which benefit from its robust email security measures. Educational institutions prioritize safe communication for staff and students, while healthcare organizations focus on protecting sensitive patient data. Financial services benefit from preventing data breaches and fraud through advanced threats management.
Gain proactive, industry leading Zero Trust cybersecurity capabilities with ThreatLocker. By employing a deny-by-default approach, you will greatly enhance your security and operational efficiency. Solutions from ThreatLocker are focused on precise application control and
streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Application Control solutions include Zero Trust Alllowlisting, Zero Trust Ringfencing and Privilege Access Management, significantly reducing any unauthorized software activities in your environment. Granular controls improve your overall security, while ringfencing enhances application behavior monitoring. Elevation requests will allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and
unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker to ensure endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high
security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.