No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Airlock Digital Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 17, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.7
Airlock Digital Application Control enhances security, efficiency, and IT productivity despite initial integration challenges, saving resources and time.
Sentiment score
6.2
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform enhances security and productivity, offering cost savings and compliance, driving business growth and customer satisfaction.
We estimated that support tickets related to unauthorized software decreased by around thirty-five to forty percent, and the time spent investigating suspicious or unknown executables was reduced from several hours to less than thirty minutes because administrators could quickly verify application status through centralized policies and audit records.
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
The return on investment is that in five years, we have never had a breach or a malware event that has been a result of Airlock Digital Application Control.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
I would say Airlock Digital Application Control saves around thirty percent of our time.
Senior Systems Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Tier 1 IT Engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
Head Of Cyber Security at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
System Administrator at Gwynedd Mercy University
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Airlock Digital's customer support is praised for responsiveness, technical expertise, and resolving deployment and troubleshooting queries effectively.
Sentiment score
7.8
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is praised for its rapid, effective customer service, despite occasional delays with chatbots.
When you speak and share the problem you are facing, you can troubleshoot things much faster than via chat or email.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
The technical support of Airlock Digital Application Control receives a rating of 10 because only a few cases were opened and they were handled perfectly.
Server Administrator at Kuwait National Petroleum Company
I would rate the customer support for Airlock Digital Application Control ten out of ten because it helped us considerably.
Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
Systems Security Analyst & Deputy Security Officer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Director, Managed Services at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Their support is world-class.
Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Airlock Digital offers scalable application control with seamless onboarding, centralized management, and minor reporting challenges in expansive environments.
Sentiment score
7.8
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform seamlessly scales and adapts for organizations of all sizes, ensuring flexibility, performance, and protection.
Successful scalability depends not only on the product itself but also on having well-defined governance and policy management processes in place.
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
It supports centralized policy management, easy onboarding of new devices, and consistent application control enforcement across diverse environments.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
I find Airlock Digital Application Control very scalable.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
Technical Engineer at Cloud 1 Solutions
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
Systems Security Analyst & Deputy Security Officer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
CEO at Mostro
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Airlock Digital Application Control is stable, consistently deploys policies, resolves past issues, and reliably manages applications in large environments.
Sentiment score
7.9
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is stable and reliable, with minimal issues, quickly resolved, and consistent performance across installations.
After they rolled out 5.2.2, these issues were completely resolved.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Any stability issues we have experienced are the result of us blocking the wrong application, which is not the product's fault because it works as advertised.
Sr Coordinator For Cybersecurity System And Networks at Nsw Institute Of Sport
The stability of Airlock Digital Application Control has been excellent, and I rate it a 10.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
Information Cybersecurity Technology Specialist at Freez.it
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
COO at Panda Technology
 

Room For Improvement

Enhancements in automation, user interfaces, and reporting are needed for Airlock Digital, alongside improved guides and documentation.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform needs better training, support, integration, and user interface to address deployment challenges and improve usability.
I think more guides on how to onboard and bring Airlock Digital Application Control into production would be helpful; these aren’t technical needs, more around documentation and potentially some videos on how to onboard or how to bring it into your organization more efficiently.
OT Cyber Specialist at a tech services company
Simpler policy creation for large or complex environments is needed in Airlock Digital Application Control.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
I wish Airlock Digital Application Control would add more integrations, and automation could be improved further, particularly around identifying trusted applications and recommending policy changes, which would reduce the amount of manual efforts given to this application.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
COO at Panda Technology
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
Technical Support Engineer at CMIT Solutions of Central Orlando
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
Server Administrator at Clay County Sheriff's Office
 

Setup Cost

Airlock Digital's pricing is transparent and predictable, suitable for large enterprises, with some seeking more licensing flexibility.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers competitive, flexible pricing with customizable options, valued features, and includes ongoing support for enterprises.
It is a good quality product that always works, and I do not think it is overpriced in any way.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
The initial setup cost was reasonable because the deployment did not require significant additional infrastructure beyond what we already had in place.
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Pricing and setup cost for Airlock Digital Application Control are very low.
Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
Director, Managed Services at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
Helpdesk Engineer at Computer Network Infrastructure (CNI) Consultants
 

Valuable Features

Airlock Digital offers effective application control with allow-listing, policy management, seamless integration, and reliable malware blocking for large environments.
ThreatLocker enhances security with application control, Ringfencing, and intelligent features, offering flexible and efficient management.
With Airlock Digital Application Control, we have proper governance in place because by default, everything is blocked. We follow the policy of zero trust. Anything which is not known is completely blocked.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
When whitelisting something, it applies immediately over the network.
Server Administrator at Kuwait National Petroleum Company
The policy change history feature helps us improve our auditability and governance over policies by allowing us to report to our auditors if they have any questions about how we use it and what we do with it.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
Cyber Security Specialist at Bremmar Consulting
It protects our customers.
CTO at Zettabytes
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
Tier 1 IT Engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Airlock Digital Application...
Ranking in Application Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Pla...
Ranking in Application Control
1st
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (3rd), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (5th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (6th), Ransomware Protection (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Airlock Digital Application Control is 9.6%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is 15.7%, down from 22.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform15.7%
Airlock Digital Application Control9.6%
Other74.7%
Application Control
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Application allow listing has strengthened endpoint security and streamlines software approvals
Airlock Digital Application Control is a solid product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently. While the initial deployment can be planned carefully, keeping policies current as vendors release new versions requires regular attention, and that can become time-consuming for IT teams managing a large number of endpoints. I would appreciate seeing more automation around approving trusted software updates and better integrations with common software deployment and vulnerability management tools to reduce manual effort. Reporting is another area that could be enhanced, particularly with more customizable dashboards and easier ways to generate compliance and operational reports for different audiences. From an administration perspective, some troubleshooting workflows could be more intuitive, especially when identifying why an application was blocked or determining the exact policy responsible for the decision. These limitations have not been significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the product, but addressing them would make day-to-day management more efficient, reduce administrative overhead, and improve the overall experience for security and endpoint management teams. One additional area for improvement is the overall user and administration experience. While the platform is functional, I think some of the management workflows could be simplified so that common tasks such as reviewing blocked applications, approving legitimate software, or tracing the reason behind a policy decision require fewer steps. For organizations with lean IT teams, a more intuitive interface and clearer guidance during policy creation would help reduce the learning curve for new administrators. I would appreciate seeing broader integrations with the endpoint management, SIEM, and IT service management platforms so application events, approval requests, and policy updates can fit more naturally into existing operational workflows. Better APIs and pre-built integrations would reduce manual work and make automation easier for larger environments. More flexible reporting and customizable dashboards would help different teams, whether security operations or compliance, quickly access the information that is most relevant to them without having to manually compile reports. Addressing these areas would improve efficiency and make the product easier to operate as organizations scale their endpoint environments.
Santo Joy - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of Cyber Security at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Security controls have been strengthened with granular application, ringfencing, and access policies
The features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform that I like the most are the Ringfencing, elevation control, storage control, and application whitelisting functionality. For examples of how these features benefit my company, we were looking for a solution across various vendors to actually implement application whitelisting controls. ThreatLocker's agent, which is very lightweight and does not use much CPU or RAM, helped us achieve that solution. Ringfencing was an add-on that ticked off a lot of Australian framework security controls, which is the reason we chose it. My impression of the allowlisting feature in terms of managing which software, scripts, and libraries run on my devices is that ThreatLocker's community page has a lot of information around this, which is very helpful. Not only that, the Cyber Hero support that ThreatLocker provides gives us insights and best practices, helping us achieve that solution and guiding us to the right platform. The impact of Ringfencing on controlling the behavior of approved applications has been a big winner for us because it is something that many other platforms do not provide as a functionality. Having that allowed us to identify what applications talk to each other, which is something that many other platforms do not do. The network control feature impacts my ability to manage network traffic across my endpoints and servers. We have not used this widely across all our partners, but wherever required, we use it. It has been an easy solution for those customers to get that control implemented. The elevation feature's role in facilitating just-in-time administrative access for approved applications shows that elevation control helps in many use cases involving remote control platforms, door usage, and security system platforms that require local admins. There are many solutions that provide this functionality, but the licensing cost seems to be expensive, and it also adds another solution into the mix. Rather than doing that, we try to use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform to achieve that control. Regarding the storage control feature, I have used it. The primary function is USB blocking, which is very widely adopted, and also just locking down and allowing certain users to access certain file locations helps us there. When it comes to enforcing policy-driven access over various storage devices, it depends on the business risk adapted by the companies that we support, but generally the use case is USB and external storage devices where companies know that is a risk, but they do not have appropriate solutions. There are EDR platforms that claim to do this, but ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform does it at an advanced level. My assessment of the efficiency of the real-time threat intelligence and category controls employed by Web Control in blocking malicious and non-compliant sites leads me to think that Web Control is another functionality within ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform that is an add-on on top of the current set. That is another solution that we use based on what is required for the company, but again, that is not widely adapted yet for our partners.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.
912,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
35%
Construction Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business56
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Airlock Digital Application Control?
Airlock Digital Application Control could be improved with a better management interface, richer reporting and analytics, broader third-party integrations, and simpler policy creation for large or ...
What is your primary use case for Airlock Digital Application Control?
My main use case for Airlock Digital Application Control is to implement application whitelisting, prevent unauthorized software from running, and strengthen endpoint security against malware and r...
What advice do you have for others considering Airlock Digital Application Control?
My advice to others looking into using Airlock Digital Application Control is to start with a clear application control strategy, use audit mode before enforcing policies, involve application owner...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
I am not sure about operational or cost expenses because we have not really experienced that.
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
When it comes to ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform's policy making, it is very granular, but the moment you zoom out, you have a lot of information or a lot of alerts. However, the moment you zoom i...
What is your primary use case for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform's main use case for us was data storage access control.We used ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for identifying the most critical and sensitive information of the o...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Airlock Digital Application Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
912,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.