No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Airlock Digital Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 17, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.3
Airlock Digital boosts efficiency and security, with significant time savings, though some focus on process alignment without financial returns.
Sentiment score
6.2
ThreatLocker enhances security, reduces costs, boosts productivity, and facilitates growth by blocking unauthorized applications and preventing malware.
We estimated that support tickets related to unauthorized software decreased by around thirty-five to forty percent, and the time spent investigating suspicious or unknown executables was reduced from several hours to less than thirty minutes because administrators could quickly verify application status through centralized policies and audit records.
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
The return on investment is that in five years, we have never had a breach or a malware event that has been a result of Airlock Digital Application Control.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
I would say Airlock Digital Application Control saves around thirty percent of our time.
Senior Systems Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Tier 1 IT Engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
Head Of Cyber Security at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
System Administrator at Gwynedd Mercy University
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Airlock Digital support is highly rated for quick, knowledgeable service and effective issue resolution, despite occasional delays.
Sentiment score
7.8
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform excels in customer support with quick resolutions, expert assistance, and effective live chat services.
When you speak and share the problem you are facing, you can troubleshoot things much faster than via chat or email.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
The technical support of Airlock Digital Application Control receives a rating of 10 because only a few cases were opened and they were handled perfectly.
Server Administrator at Kuwait National Petroleum Company
What I found is that their support team is quite technical, and their approach in understanding and resolving the issue is very direct and robust.
Manager Mssp & Cybersecurity at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
Systems Security Analyst & Deputy Security Officer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Director, Managed Services at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Their support is world-class.
Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Airlock Digital Application Control is highly scalable, managing over 20,000 endpoints effectively with centralized management and consistent control.
Sentiment score
7.8
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform seamlessly scales across organizations, managing thousands of endpoints, ensuring performance, and easy user integration.
Successful scalability depends not only on the product itself but also on having well-defined governance and policy management processes in place.
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
It supports centralized policy management, easy onboarding of new devices, and consistent application control enforcement across diverse environments.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
I find Airlock Digital Application Control very scalable.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
Technical Engineer at Cloud 1 Solutions
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
Systems Security Analyst & Deputy Security Officer at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
CEO at Mostro
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Airlock Digital Application Control is highly stable, with consistent performance and seamless integration across large environments without system issues.
Sentiment score
7.9
Organizations find ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform stable and reliable, with minor issues quickly resolved by support.
After they rolled out 5.2.2, these issues were completely resolved.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Any stability issues we have experienced are the result of us blocking the wrong application, which is not the product's fault because it works as advertised.
Sr Coordinator For Cybersecurity System And Networks at Nsw Institute Of Sport
The stability of Airlock Digital Application Control has been excellent, and I rate it a 10.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
Information Cybersecurity Technology Specialist at Freez.it
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
COO at Panda Technology
 

Room For Improvement

Airlock Digital needs security upgrades, performance improvements, better integrations, streamlined onboarding, intuitive UI, and enhanced automation and reporting.
Users seek improved training, integrations, transparency, UI, and communication in ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for enhanced usability and administration.
I think more guides on how to onboard and bring Airlock Digital Application Control into production would be helpful; these aren’t technical needs, more around documentation and potentially some videos on how to onboard or how to bring it into your organization more efficiently.
OT Cyber Specialist at a tech services company
Simpler policy creation for large or complex environments is needed in Airlock Digital Application Control.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
Some of the vulnerabilities that are meant for CVEs specific to Airlock Digital Application Control need to be addressed in newer versions.
Manager Mssp & Cybersecurity at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
COO at Panda Technology
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
Technical Support Engineer at CMIT Solutions of Central Orlando
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
Server Administrator at Clay County Sheriff's Office
 

Setup Cost

Airlock Digital offers cost-effective pricing for enterprises, with straightforward licensing and predictable costs, enhancing security with minimal investment.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform provides flexible, scalable pricing with tiered plans and negotiable deals, ensuring cost-effectiveness and transparency.
It is a good quality product that always works, and I do not think it is overpriced in any way.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
The initial setup cost was reasonable because the deployment did not require significant additional infrastructure beyond what we already had in place.
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
The deal received for Airlock Digital Application Control is comparatively better than the deal received for Ivanti, which is why the company selected this solution.
Server Administrator at Kuwait National Petroleum Company
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
Director, Managed Services at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
Helpdesk Engineer at Computer Network Infrastructure (CNI) Consultants
 

Valuable Features

Airlock Digital streamlines policy management, enhances security, prevents unauthorized software, and integrates seamlessly, ensuring compliance without disruption.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform excels in app control, security features, and support, enhancing IT efficiency and company security.
With Airlock Digital Application Control, we have proper governance in place because by default, everything is blocked. We follow the policy of zero trust. Anything which is not known is completely blocked.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
When whitelisting something, it applies immediately over the network.
Server Administrator at Kuwait National Petroleum Company
The policy change history feature helps us improve our auditability and governance over policies by allowing us to report to our auditors if they have any questions about how we use it and what we do with it.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
Cyber Security Specialist at Bremmar Consulting
It protects our customers.
CTO at Zettabytes
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
Tier 1 IT Engineer at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Airlock Digital Application...
Ranking in Application Control
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Pla...
Ranking in Application Control
1st
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (4th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (4th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (5th), Ransomware Protection (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Airlock Digital Application Control is 10.5%, up from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is 16.6%, down from 20.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform16.6%
Airlock Digital Application Control10.5%
Other72.9%
Application Control
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Application allow listing has strengthened endpoint security and streamlines software approvals
Airlock Digital Application Control is a solid product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently. While the initial deployment can be planned carefully, keeping policies current as vendors release new versions requires regular attention, and that can become time-consuming for IT teams managing a large number of endpoints. I would appreciate seeing more automation around approving trusted software updates and better integrations with common software deployment and vulnerability management tools to reduce manual effort. Reporting is another area that could be enhanced, particularly with more customizable dashboards and easier ways to generate compliance and operational reports for different audiences. From an administration perspective, some troubleshooting workflows could be more intuitive, especially when identifying why an application was blocked or determining the exact policy responsible for the decision. These limitations have not been significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the product, but addressing them would make day-to-day management more efficient, reduce administrative overhead, and improve the overall experience for security and endpoint management teams. One additional area for improvement is the overall user and administration experience. While the platform is functional, I think some of the management workflows could be simplified so that common tasks such as reviewing blocked applications, approving legitimate software, or tracing the reason behind a policy decision require fewer steps. For organizations with lean IT teams, a more intuitive interface and clearer guidance during policy creation would help reduce the learning curve for new administrators. I would appreciate seeing broader integrations with the endpoint management, SIEM, and IT service management platforms so application events, approval requests, and policy updates can fit more naturally into existing operational workflows. Better APIs and pre-built integrations would reduce manual work and make automation easier for larger environments. More flexible reporting and customizable dashboards would help different teams, whether security operations or compliance, quickly access the information that is most relevant to them without having to manually compile reports. Addressing these areas would improve efficiency and make the product easier to operate as organizations scale their endpoint environments.
Santo Joy - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of Cyber Security at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Security controls have been strengthened with granular application, ringfencing, and access policies
The features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform that I like the most are the Ringfencing, elevation control, storage control, and application whitelisting functionality. For examples of how these features benefit my company, we were looking for a solution across various vendors to actually implement application whitelisting controls. ThreatLocker's agent, which is very lightweight and does not use much CPU or RAM, helped us achieve that solution. Ringfencing was an add-on that ticked off a lot of Australian framework security controls, which is the reason we chose it. My impression of the allowlisting feature in terms of managing which software, scripts, and libraries run on my devices is that ThreatLocker's community page has a lot of information around this, which is very helpful. Not only that, the Cyber Hero support that ThreatLocker provides gives us insights and best practices, helping us achieve that solution and guiding us to the right platform. The impact of Ringfencing on controlling the behavior of approved applications has been a big winner for us because it is something that many other platforms do not provide as a functionality. Having that allowed us to identify what applications talk to each other, which is something that many other platforms do not do. The network control feature impacts my ability to manage network traffic across my endpoints and servers. We have not used this widely across all our partners, but wherever required, we use it. It has been an easy solution for those customers to get that control implemented. The elevation feature's role in facilitating just-in-time administrative access for approved applications shows that elevation control helps in many use cases involving remote control platforms, door usage, and security system platforms that require local admins. There are many solutions that provide this functionality, but the licensing cost seems to be expensive, and it also adds another solution into the mix. Rather than doing that, we try to use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform to achieve that control. Regarding the storage control feature, I have used it. The primary function is USB blocking, which is very widely adopted, and also just locking down and allowing certain users to access certain file locations helps us there. When it comes to enforcing policy-driven access over various storage devices, it depends on the business risk adapted by the companies that we support, but generally the use case is USB and external storage devices where companies know that is a risk, but they do not have appropriate solutions. There are EDR platforms that claim to do this, but ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform does it at an advanced level. My assessment of the efficiency of the real-time threat intelligence and category controls employed by Web Control in blocking malicious and non-compliant sites leads me to think that Web Control is another functionality within ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform that is an add-on on top of the current set. That is another solution that we use based on what is required for the company, but again, that is not widely adapted yet for our partners.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.
907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
34%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business56
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Airlock Digital Application Control?
I think there are features that are coming down the pipeline that we don’t have yet; one of which is the ability to have a managed installer process. There is that capability currently, but it’s re...
What is your primary use case for Airlock Digital Application Control?
Application whitelisting has become increasingly important, and ensuring that we’re not running code unknown to our organization is crucial. The organizations I work for have been using it to effec...
What advice do you have for others considering Airlock Digital Application Control?
I think the user experience is quite good for a modern product; the reporting is getting better with every release, and at this stage, I don’t have any specific points on the reporting that I would...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is straightforward, and there are no issues.
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
Improvements for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform could include some additional guidance in the beginning of setup. We were fortunate enough to work with an engineer for a lot of our setup and it w...
What is your primary use case for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
My main use case for ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform is endpoint protection, a zero trust platform for applications, We use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for application whitelisting and blackl...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Airlock Digital Application Control vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
907,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.