We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and Tungsten TotalAgility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"The product is really good, and it is easy to use. It comes with multiple integrations. The solution keeps up with the trend of Microsoft Copilot and AI."
"What I find most valuable in Kofax TotalAgility is its OCR feature. I also find its workflow and business process management capabilities valuable. Kofax TotalAgility also has good integration with other solutions and has an API call feature."
"Great with recognition providing a high level of confidence."
"Essentially, Kofax TotalAgility as a whole is quite nice. As of now, we've only been able to use and explore its document classification and extraction capabilities. We haven't explored and used the case management capability yet, but the scan and capture capabilities we've been using heavily and those are quite good. Our solutions are mainly around those areas of Kofax TotalAgility. We haven't explored the product a lot, but the capabilities we've explored are good."
"Now it has an OCR, optical character recognition, engine where it can extract data from the document."
"One feature I like is that it makes the matrix easy for an unstructured document."
"It's a growing tool that offers a complete package of BPM, case management, and capture capabilities."
"Its integration capabilities are valuable. It has low code/no code features. You have to do minimal coding."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Room for improvement would be better OCR functionality in terms of Arabic OCR. There should be better accuracy."
"It would be nice if the tool has more connectors to different systems. It is an expensive solution."
"Kofax should improve its handwritten extractions."
"Table line item extraction is not possible through Quick Capture."
"There needs to be more accessible certification and better pricing."
"The product's console version is old. It should also improve its forum."
"The Transformation Designer of KTA can be made better."
"Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."
Earn 20 points
ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Tungsten TotalAgility is ranked 4th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 22 reviews. ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while Tungsten TotalAgility is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten TotalAgility writes "Great with recognition and provides a high level of confidence in terms of extraction capabilities". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform, whereas Tungsten TotalAgility is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, OpenText Intelligent Capture, UiPath Document Understanding, Hyland Brainware and Tungsten RPA.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.