"Aruba ClearPass has complete NAC features."
"Aruba ClearPass's most valuable features are simple accessing, operating, and management. Additionally, the dashboard and performance work well."
"A lot of the issues in Forescout are mitigated in Aruba ClearPass, it supports all the expected protocols."
"ClearPass prevents hackers from accessing the network. No one can get inside without authentication. It provides a lot of features we are missing. It's incredibly powerful and stable."
"Stable with good QBT technology."
"The interface is very easy to use and the workflow is quite straightforward."
"The most valuable features of Aruba ClearPass are the authentication mechanisms and the integration with Active Directory(AD)."
"The visibility and security features are most valuable. We get a clear view. It is a very secure product for educational institutions."
"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."
"I find the solution to be very rich in features."
"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."
"The implementation can improve because it is challenging to explain some of the concepts to the client."
"Like most security products, ClearPass is difficult to deploy. You need to use the CLI to implement security products from any vendor, so configuring the authentication is complicated."
"ClearPass' interface could be more user-friendly."
"Lacks the ability to handle more than one certificate for both the management process and the Captive Portal."
"The initial setup was quite complex, it is not that easy."
"The licensing model could be improved."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the user interface, it is a bit chunky."
"The technical support has some room for improvement. It takes them a long time to respond sometimes. I rate Aruba support six out of 10."
"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."
"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."
"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 15 reviews while Ruckus Cloudpath is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.4, while Ruckus Cloudpath is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Cloudpath writes "Does what's needed with good technical support and good coverage". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and macmon Network Access Control, whereas Ruckus Cloudpath is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Sophos Network Access Control and Forescout Platform. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Ruckus Cloudpath report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
