ExtremeControl vs Ruckus Cloudpath comparison

Extreme and Ruckus are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Extreme is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0, while Ruckus is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.3. Extreme holds a 1.8% mindshare in NAC, compared to Ruckus’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Extreme users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

ExtremeControl

Read 7 ExtremeControl reviews

815 Views
618 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 9 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

1,140 Views
648 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtremeControl

Ruckus Cloudpath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

ExtremeControl and Ruckus Cloudpath are competing products in network access control and security management. ExtremeControl has the advantage in integration with existing infrastructure, while Ruckus Cloudpath offers greater flexibility and advanced authentication methods.

Features: ExtremeControl focuses on seamless integration with varied network environments, strong policy enforcement, and customizable security settings. Ruckus Cloudpath offers advanced security protocols, a wide range of identity management options, and scalable architecture for better customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Cloudpath is known for its straightforward and efficient deployment with an intuitive setup process. Its customer service is quick and responsive. ExtremeControl's deployment is designed to be highly customizable, potentially extending installation times but allowing tailored implementation. It offers comprehensive support services that may require longer engagement.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeControl typically has a higher initial setup cost with long-term ROI linked to its integration capabilities and extensive support network. Ruckus Cloudpath provides competitive pricing with a cost-effective solution and strong ROI through advanced features and flexible deployment options, presenting a more budget-friendly alternative without sacrificing critical functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtremeControl

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of ExtremeControl is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Jose Mota

IT specialist at FERCAM SpA

Has a simple setup process, but it could be affordable

We have noticed similarities between Extreme and Ubiquiti, particularly in their functionality, like how they operate wirelessly and can be managed from the cloud or locally. Based on our experience, Ubiquiti's system may be more user-friendly and capable of handling heavy loads. Still, Extreme could be more reliable, although you have yet to compare them side by side directly. For instance, we have observed Extreme performing well in a warehouse environment, which might have a different level of network traffic than a convention center.

Read full review

Xander Janse Van Rensburg

Head Of Technical Services at Emtelle

Helps to onboard corporate users based on certificate-based authentication

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process. Its most valuable feature is CA certification. You cannot get access without this. The tool's device policy enforcement feature has had a positive impact on customer network security. Customers are now more at ease, knowing that their employees connect to a secure network, and unauthorized individuals cannot easily access the corporate network. Overall, it has positively influenced their security measures. The user experience when connecting to networks via Ruckus Cloudpath is seamless. I would highly recommend it to anyone in need of an onboarding system for multiple users. Whether you want to move away from the standard connection, Active Directory, or even free keys, it is a reliable choice. Additionally, the product's licensing is user-based, not device-based. This means that regardless of the number of devices, the licensing is per-user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use."

"It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations."

"Overall, I would rate ExtremeControl nine out of ten."

"I can know which end users are using which features."

"The company also uses Cisco ISE in other places. I have been told that ExtremeControl is easier to use than ISE. The other reason we prefer ExtremeControl is stability. That's why they chose it for this big hospital in Oslo."

"There is information on migrating most of the cloud system's features."

"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is effective for network security since it points out errors, especially when working with APIs."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is very stable."

"The most valuable features of Ruckus Cloudpath include its long-range capabilities, smooth and uninterrupted service, and reliability."

"I have found it easy to use with no significant issues once the small initial problems were resolved."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

Cons

"The installation is easy, it can take between five minutes to four hours depending on the complexity of the environment. The speed of the installation could improve for more complex environments."

"The initial setup was not easy. It requires an experienced person to deploy ExtremeControl, and deployment can take from days to weeks depending on the complexity of the network."

"I would rate their technical support five out of ten. They have strict upgrade policies."

"There isn't enough development for the on-premises controller."

"One improvement could be better clarification, namely that the system only works optimally with all components purchased together."

"I'd like to have access to more information on the traffic passing through."

"The scalability could be better."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

"Ruckus Cloudpath needs more API features and enhanced automation capabilities."

"There is room for improvement in deployment."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"There is room for improvement in deployment. I would like to see more effort put into troubleshooting."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"The setup process is a bit complex."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ExtremeControl can be expensive compared to other options in the market."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Government

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtremeControl?

It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtremeControl?

ExtremeControl is a great solution, but it is mainly focused on wireless. For their wired network, especially with third-party switching, this is where most of the features are lost.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ExtremeControl?

We have projects with mostly government entities. They want to create some policies for individuals who access Active Directory through others as an authentication method. They have Active Director...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side. I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

Ruckus Cloudpath needs more API features and enhanced automation capabilities. I would like to improve the automation aspect, ensuring that if any issues arise or alerts are detected, the cloud pla...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs ExtremeControl

Compared 47% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeControl

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs ExtremeControl

Compared 13% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtremeControl

Compared 10% of the time

More ExtremeControl Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 61% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 16% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

April 2025

Download ExtremeControl product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

April 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Also Known As

Extreme Access Control, Enterasys NAC

No data available

Overview

ExtremeControl lets you manage secure and automated access for both, BYOD and IoT devices from one convenient dashboard. It makes it easy to roll out granular policies across your wired and wireless networks to meet industry and company compliance obligations. Identity based network access control keeps unauthorized people and devices from accessing your network.

Extreme

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Street Crane, Robert Bosch, Molex Chengdu, Weir Valves & Controls UK, Renault, AESSEAL, Ducati, Alexander Dennis, UK Ministry of Defence, Manz

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

April 2025

Free Report: ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtremeControl vs. Ruckus Cloudpath report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.