Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security vs Trellix Embedded Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Embedded Control
Ranking in IoT Security
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 6.6%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Embedded Control is 2.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security6.6%
Trellix Embedded Control2.5%
Other90.9%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Engineerinfosec67 - PeerSpot reviewer
Presale Engineer at Westcon-Comstor
Recognizing and classifying devices with AI and machine learning boosts security without extra network controls
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security integrates with a cloud-based engine that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning for device recognition and classification based on traffic types. This adaptability, which does not rely strictly on a static database, allows for identifying a wider range of devices. The behavior-based identification of devices enhances the capabilities of security controls, extending the network security platform's recognition capacity without deploying a separate network access control system.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd
Offers DLP solutions with drive encryption, and application control
When installing McAfee ePO, we need to set up a self-check configuration. To join the system, we run a specific command. We configure connections for the data center, data server, and application server during this setup. Sometimes, we encounter communication issues between the database and application servers. These issues can prevent the database from communicating with ePO, leading to problems with updates and other functions. If the database cannot communicate with ePO, it affects our ability to manage configurations and updates, creating various issues. Additionally, roaming users outside the network must receive the latest signatures and updates. In a Citrix environment, a handler is configured to manage communication for these roaming users. However, we sometimes face issues with public and private IP configurations. Users may prefer to keep their IPs private, which can cause complications. For environments without Internet access, we use a DNS server to facilitate updates, which are managed locally. This type of configuration can be complex, but it's crucial for maintaining functionality without external network access. Trellix Embedded Control is a product used by companies in infrastructure development. The specific products and tools they use can vary based on their needs. DLP operates with devices, but network DLP is required for classification tasks. The choice of solutions depends on the organization's infrastructure and customer requirements, guiding the following implementation steps. Clients deploy the solution with their provider within one week.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix is expensive, depending on the organization's size and financial capacity. For some, it is economical and fits well with their infrastructure. Larger organizations may seek a high-quality p...
What needs improvement with Trellix Embedded Control?
Customers and organizations are aware of attacks in VPN environments and how to protect against them. Forensic investigations play a crucial role in understanding why such attacks occur and how the...
What is your primary use case for Trellix Embedded Control?
Trellix offers many products, such as DLP solutions for endpoint and network, drive encryption, and application control. It also provides robust endpoint security solutions. Furthermore, Trellix of...
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Embedded Control, Intel Security Controller, McAfee Controller
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Kleberg Bank, Sicredi, Seagate, Loop Technology, Vidant Health, Xcel Energy, Cook County, Berkshire Health Systems, Mauser, China Pacific Insurance, Cologne-Bonn Airport, Bank Central Asia, Boston Medical Center, Boston Scientific
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Armis, Palo Alto Networks and others in IoT Security. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.