Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Nozomi and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Nozomi is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Nozomi holds a 11.6% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nozomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Nozomi Networks

Read 26 Nozomi Networks reviews

7,146 Views
2,215 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Read 11 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews

1,767 Views
1,767 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nozomi Networks

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Nozomi Networks and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security are competitors in the IoT security category, each with unique advantages. Nozomi Networks has favorable pricing and support, while Palo Alto Networks offers superior features that make it a better investment.

Features: Nozomi Networks focuses on network visibility and threat detection, including advanced network monitoring and asset management. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security offers advanced threat prevention, seamless integration with its other products, and enhanced analytics with machine learning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Nozomi Networks could improve by enhancing analytics and integration capabilities, expanding machine learning features, and refining user interface aesthetics. Palo Alto Networks might work on simplifying deployment processes, reducing complexity in feature configuration, and pricing adjustments for broader market reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nozomi Networks provides an easy deployment process with user-friendly guidance and responsive customer service. Palo Alto Networks, though complex in setup, offers detailed deployment strategies and strong technical support for custom solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Nozomi Networks is seen as cost-effective with high ROI due to lower initial setup costs. Palo Alto Networks, despite a higher upfront cost, provides substantial ROI through long-term security benefits and reduced operational risks, justifying its pricing as a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in IoT Security

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Ranking in IoT Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 11.6%, down from 28.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 5.5%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks	11.6%
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security	5.5%
Other	82.9%

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam

Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint

Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation

On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2774463

Manager ERP (Insurance) at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Have used it to manage device updates remotely and now see potential for improved centralized control

One of the favorite features is that they can plug in a device and update it without being on the network, so you can perform an offline update. If all the IoT devices in the field can provide a single pane of glass and management through that platform in a controlled fashion, that would be really beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted our organization since we are in the asset owner environment."

"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."

"The return on investment from Nozomi Networks is substantial, particularly concerning time saved."

"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."

"Nozomi Networks is the easiest to use, with the capability to build really quickly an overview of your infrastructure."

"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted our organization as we can visualize the traffic within the OT networks and identify the potential threats or vulnerabilities."

"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted my organization by ensuring my assets remain secure."

"Nozomi Networks has impacted our organization positively as we have gained trust from customers in terms of the technology results and everything that the technology brings."

More Nozomi Networks pros

"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."

"The stability is pretty good; it's a very solid solution, so if customers are looking for an IoT/OT solution, they should consider Palo Alto Networks IoT Security."

"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."

"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."

"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."

"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."

"I would recommend Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to any organization with automation plants or standard enterprise IT environments."

"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros

Cons

"Nozomi Networks can be improved in many points. First of all, reduce the cost. That is really important because many companies are not so huge and many companies cannot acquire this kind of licensing."

"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."

"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."

"Integrating with other security devices is a little difficult because this process is not currently automated."

"I see challenges with Nozomi Networks mainly as a detection or visibility tool, but it does not actively block traffic by design for safety reasons."

"I think Nozomi Networks should still work on the graphical user interface because it can be more friendly in terms of user experience, especially regarding the flows, the workflows, the intuitiveness of certain things and positions of certain buttons or even creating a dashboard for yourself in a way easier manner."

"I think Nozomi Networks can be improved by enhancing the size of the boxes and the performance for collecting logs, and of course, the price."

"I would like more customizable options for configurations."

More Nozomi Networks cons

"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."

"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."

"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."

"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."

"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."

"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."

"Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's reporting capabilities are less comprehensive and robust than those provided by Cisco."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."

"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."

"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

My experience with Nozomi Networks in terms of pricing and licensing is that it is generally a premium solution, not a standard one for all organizational needs. It is more than a typical premium s...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

I see challenges with Nozomi Networks mainly as a detection or visibility tool, but it does not actively block traffic by design for safety reasons. If it detects any abnormalities, it suggests usi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?

I primarily use Nozomi Networks for two main use cases in our environment: OT asset visibility and inventory management, as well as threat detection and anomaly monitoring, which is very important ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 21% of the time

Dragos vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 13% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Secure Your IoT and OT vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 16% of the time

Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 11% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 10% of the time

Allot IoTSecure vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks

July 2026

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

July 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report

Also Known As

SCADAguardian

No data available

Overview

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security enhances device classification and security through a cloud-based AI engine. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, supporting zero-trust policies and efficient network management.

Focused on securing on-premises and industrial control systems, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security utilizes AI-driven integration with Cortex Data Lake for automated security policy management. It aids endpoint security, IoT log monitoring, and regulatory compliance, offering centralized threat protection and vulnerability detection across diverse applications. Challenges include user-friendliness, scalability, and integration with infrastructure, but the service supports robust VPN capabilities and next-gen firewall technology.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Application Visibility: Offers deep insights into device operations.
Third-Party Integration: Enables seamless connections with existing systems.
Zero-Trust Policies: Implements granular security controls.
AI Device Classification: Utilizes cloud-based AI for advanced device management.
Cortex Data Lake: Enhances logging and threat management capabilities.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from using Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Comprehensive Management: Intuitive dashboard simplifies network oversight.
Offline Updates: Supports continued security even without direct cloud access.
Custom Policy Creation: Allows efficient security policy customization.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Offers robust defense across various environments.
VPN Capabilities: Provides secure connectivity in diverse scenarios.

In specific industries, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security serves as a critical tool for centralized network security in on-premises and operational technology environments. It is deployed for automated vulnerability detection and compliance across different applications, addressing regulatory and network security challenges for enterprises.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

August 2026

Free Report: Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.