Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Nozomi and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Nozomi is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Nozomi holds a 10.2% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nozomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Nozomi Networks

Read 28 Nozomi Networks reviews

7,459 Views
2,387 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Read 11 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews

1,904 Views
1,904 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nozomi Networks

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Nozomi Networks and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security compete in the network security space. Nozomi Networks stands out with its comprehensive asset management and protocol intelligence, while Palo Alto Networks impresses with its integration capabilities and analytics.

Features: Nozomi Networks offers in-depth protocol mapping, real-time threat detection, and comprehensive asset management. It effectively identifies OT protocols such as OPC UA, Modbus, and Siemens S7, providing valuable network visualization. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security integrates seamlessly with Cisco tools and utilizes Cortex Data Lake for robust analytics. Its application-based security approach enhances protection and offers real-time risk assessments.

Room for Improvement: Nozomi Networks could improve its AI capabilities and pricing models. Enhancements in user interface would also add value. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security should focus on improving user-friendliness and expanding its analytical features. Its pricing remains high, requiring more competitive options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nozomi Networks typically deploys on-premises, praised for its customer service though sometimes experiencing response delays. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security focuses on cloud deployment, with its integration praised but deployment complexity varying. Both provide strong customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Nozomi Networks is considered a premium solution with a focus on asset protection, showing significant ROI through time and resource efficiency. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, with its higher cost, delivers ROI through robust integration and security features. Their licensing model based on probes can offer savings in certain scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in IoT Security

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Ranking in IoT Security

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 10.2%, down from 24.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 5.3%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks	10.2%
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security	5.3%
Other	84.5%

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

Apurva Nigam

Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint

Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation

On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Read full review

Muhammad Ahsan Riaz

Chief Information Security Officer at Packages Group

Responsive system enhances network management but integration needs refinement

I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage. As an insurance company in the financial sector, we must meet strict regulatory requirements, and Palo Alto has proven to be an excellent solution. Its management is straightforward, the dashboards and reporting are comprehensive, and most importantly, it functions exactly as described in the documentation. For example, when we needed to block YouTube on our network, Palo Alto successfully blocked access while our Cisco firewall failed to block access on iPhones. This highlights the inconsistency we've experienced with different firewalls, whereas Palo Alto has consistently performed as expected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Nozomi Networks is that it has built OT-oriented protocols such as OPC UA, DNP3, Modbus, and Siemens S7, and for these protocols, Nozomi Networks identifies them very perfectly."

"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."

"Nozomi Networks is an easy-to-use and powerful tool."

"I believe it is the best."

"Nozomi Networks has impacted my organization positively because we have experience with a few other vendors, and their configuration, reliability, and even threat identification are significantly lower than Nozomi Networks capabilities."

"It has impacted security operations in a better way."

"Nozomi Networks has led to specific outcomes or measurable improvements for my team, including faster response times."

"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted our organization since we are in the asset owner environment."

More Nozomi Networks pros

"The stability is pretty good; it's a very solid solution, so if customers are looking for an IoT/OT solution, they should consider Palo Alto Networks IoT Security."

"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."

"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."

"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."

"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."

"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."

"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."

"I would recommend Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to any organization with automation plants or standard enterprise IT environments."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros

Cons

"Nozomi Networks can be improved by integrating with other technologies so that teams look at a single dashboard when it comes to security issues."

"I see challenges with Nozomi Networks mainly as a detection or visibility tool, but it does not actively block traffic by design for safety reasons."

"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."

"The solution should include an integration library."

"I think Nozomi Networks can be improved by enhancing the size of the boxes and the performance for collecting logs, and of course, the price."

"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."

"We have faced downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with certain implementations."

"I think Nozomi Networks should still work on the graphical user interface because it can be more friendly in terms of user experience, especially regarding the flows, the workflows, the intuitiveness of certain things and positions of certain buttons or even creating a dashboard for yourself in a way easier manner."

More Nozomi Networks cons

"More application signatures are required."

"Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's reporting capabilities are less comprehensive and robust than those provided by Cisco."

"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."

"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."

"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."

"Essentially, this solution focuses on data analysis and cannot perform any physical actions."

"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."

"I had to call the support because there were some devices that were not showing up."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."

"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."

"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Nozomi Networks is that they are reasonable and acceptable. I would not categorize them as high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

I would suggest that Nozomi Networks could bring up a feature to link the risk rating of the client's assets to the business importance. For example, a building automation system is more important ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?

The main use case for Nozomi Networks for me was to bring up the asset inventory. My client opted for Nozomi Networks for the first time to help them know their assets better. They had many new int...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

See all answers

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 18% of the time

Dragos vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 13% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 4% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 16% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 13% of the time

Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks

October 2026

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

October 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report

Also Known As

SCADAguardian

No data available

Overview

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security enhances device classification and security through a cloud-based AI engine. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, supporting zero-trust policies and efficient network management.

Focused on securing on-premises and industrial control systems, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security utilizes AI-driven integration with Cortex Data Lake for automated security policy management. It aids endpoint security, IoT log monitoring, and regulatory compliance, offering centralized threat protection and vulnerability detection across diverse applications. Challenges include user-friendliness, scalability, and integration with infrastructure, but the service supports robust VPN capabilities and next-gen firewall technology.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Application Visibility: Offers deep insights into device operations.
Third-Party Integration: Enables seamless connections with existing systems.
Zero-Trust Policies: Implements granular security controls.
AI Device Classification: Utilizes cloud-based AI for advanced device management.
Cortex Data Lake: Enhances logging and threat management capabilities.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from using Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Comprehensive Management: Intuitive dashboard simplifies network oversight.
Offline Updates: Supports continued security even without direct cloud access.
Custom Policy Creation: Allows efficient security policy customization.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Offers robust defense across various environments.
VPN Capabilities: Provides secure connectivity in diverse scenarios.

In specific industries, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security serves as a critical tool for centralized network security in on-premises and operational technology environments. It is deployed for automated vulnerability detection and compliance across different applications, addressing regulatory and network security challenges for enterprises.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

November 2026

Free Report: Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nozomi Networks vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.