No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle Fusion Service vs SugarCRM Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Fusion Service
Ranking in CRM Customer Engagement Centers
5th
Ranking in CRM
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Marketing Management (7th)
SugarCRM Platform
Ranking in CRM Customer Engagement Centers
11th
Ranking in CRM
27th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Marketing Automation (16th), Sales Force Automation (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the CRM Customer Engagement Centers category, the mindshare of Oracle Fusion Service is 7.7%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SugarCRM Platform is 4.6%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Customer Engagement Centers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Fusion Service7.7%
SugarCRM Platform4.6%
Other87.7%
CRM Customer Engagement Centers
 

Featured Reviews

Dhivakar I - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at Deloitte
Have faced persistent configuration issues and performance delays that slow down large workflows
From a developer's perspective, it could be more open for programming language configurations. It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting. While UI and UX designs are open to JavaScript configurations, there are restrictions on certain functions that can be used. The solution could be enhanced to better serve customers when dealing with complex programs. The customer's websites face issues with loading properly, and response time gets longer when implementing larger workflows. This could be improved to achieve lower response times even with larger workflows involving multiple system integrations and complex architecture. The agent decay capabilities need improvement in future releases. Currently, there are some agent decay configurations available for developers to implement, but this area needs enhancement. Performance issues exist in the Sandbox area. The Sandbox is a trial area for configurations, but if work continues for a long time without publishing, it tends to get corrupted, requiring deletion and rework from the ground up. This has caused significant rework and effort multiple times. Technical support can be challenging to work with. When facing product-related issues or configuration problems, the support experience varies. Sometimes the technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, but often they redirect problems elsewhere and cause delays in resolution.
reviewer1345677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager / IT Planning & Architecture Services at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Easily customizable, automation enhances the marketing campaigns but support is the main hiccup for us
It has been effective in managing customer relationships. It has sales email campaigns, plus integration with Active Directory. And there are centralized reports for the CEO and the general managers. We work with automation for these marketing and email campaigns. It sends out emails to prospective customers related to sales offers automatically. And it copies the sales team so that they can follow up. They are tracking the sales leads. So, the automation within SugarCRM enhances the marketing campaigns. For now, my work is done because I am the IT strategy and planning manager. I just try to deliver the solution according to the requirements of the business. From my side, it's implemented already, the requirement related to the sales funnel. But if they have any other requirement from the business side, they will submit it to me, and then I will look for a suitable solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Everything is managed by Oracle, so they have security in place."
"Oracle Service Cloud could improve the integration for older platforms."
"It's definitely a very stable product, and I work with customers who have more than 1,000 call center agents, so you can see how robust and stable this product is."
"The solution changes the way clients work to make it easier and faster."
"The solution is easy to learn."
"With add-ins, customer portal, custom apps, and APIs, there isn't much you can't do."
"There is also a focus on maintaining efficiency, and it is a significant time saver."
"Oracle offers a wide range of applications, each capable of delivering significant value to our business."
"Good, basic out-of-the-box solution, however, in my estimation not a long term play as the design flow and user interface make it a true chore to enter data."
"Saying that, it has a small server footprint and is easy to set up."
"Affordable and commercial open source solution is good for organizations with budget constraints."
"By default, it comes with a really good model where you can start working with it without having a lot of developers in your team."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"It has sales email campaigns, plus integration with Active Directory."
"This solution's stability is very good, it runs almost without effort, and we don't have any support issues with it."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
 

Cons

"When answer links are embedded within the ticket message threads, agents are taken to the customer portal; the development team should identify another option."
"I think it is really good as it is but the chat routing could use some improvements."
"You need good IT skills to run the system well, and it's not lean to manage, though it's flexible and there are many possibilities for desired developments."
"The dependency on the dollar makes these products more costly during disruptions in currency parity, especially in countries like Pakistan."
"I would like to see more AI usage, enhanced personalization capabilities, and simpler integration capabilities."
"The UI experience needs refinement to enhance user-friendliness."
"The vendor must provide a user-friendly mobile application."
"One suggestion I have is to shorten the IT team's response time. When we submit an ASR or similar request, it takes a while to receive a response, and this can be seen as a drawback."
"Putting so many things into SugarCRM became a much-hated task, mainly because of the horrible UI."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"I would appreciate it if SugarCRM could support us in on-premise implementation."
"At the moment, there is a complicated flow in regards to the user's permissions and what they can see."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no extra licenses, everything is included in the subscription, and the price is fixed."
"Oracle's pricing is quite high, and this cost can be a significant barrier, especially for smaller companies."
"Oracle Fusion Service is a cheap and flexible solution."
"Oracle Fusion Service is more expensive than Workday."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"Licensing fees are on the higher end and I rate them an eight out of ten."
"This is definitely an expensive product compared to others on the market."
"The product has average pricing."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM Customer Engagement Centers solutions are best for your needs.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Service Cloud?
Oracle Fusion Service has many challenges, as it's not easy in customization and for adding features; there's no access for the database directly. For example, we cannot create a database link. We ...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Service Cloud?
The typical use cases for Oracle Fusion Service involve many products and services such as HCM, Supply Chain, Finance, and Fixed Assets.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Service Cloud?
Regarding licensing cost, according to each country's conditions, for Egypt, it's so expensive, whereas for the Gulf, it's almost no cost because they can pay. So I can't definitively say it's high...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle RightNow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pacifico Seguros Generales, Elsevier B.V., Madison Area Technical College, Bigtree Entertainment, Pvt. Ltd., HM Land Registry, Walmart Stores Inc., MakeMyTrip Ltd., Orbitz Worldwide LLC, Big Fish Games Inc.
Redglaze Group, TengoInternet, Hilco, Bancvue, Vet Adivsor
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Fusion Service vs. SugarCRM Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.