We compared Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Oracle Fusion Service across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Microsoft Dynamics CRM is considered robust and reliable. Users praised its ability to measure and track sales and seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365 and Azure. Oracle Fusion Service is known for its ability to seamlessly integrate solutions like the Cisco PBX system. It is also recognized for its stability and scalability.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics CRM requires improvement in terms of mobile experience, interface design, and performance. Oracle Fusion Service customers suggest enhancing the account creation process and improving integration with older platforms. They also want more customization options.
Service and Support: Reviews of Microsoft support were mixed, with some users expressing frustration at long response times and challenges contacting the support team. Customers have praised the customer service for Oracle Fusion Service, which includes a dedicated service manager and easy access to specialists.
Ease of Deployment: Some Microsoft Dynamics users found the setup uncomplicated, while others struggled with it. Setting up Oracle Fusion Service is complicated and requires expertise.
Pricing: The cost of Microsoft Dynamics depends on factors like licenses and customization. While Dynamics is generally considered expensive, some users find the pricing fair or slightly cheaper compared to competitors. Customers say Fusion Service is expensive.
ROI: Microsoft Dynamics CRM provides a significant ROI due to its upgraded features and integrations. Oracle cultivates strong relationships with customers, leading to a favorable return on investment.
Comparison Results: Users like Microsoft Dynamics CRM for its native integration with popular Microsoft products, but some users have said that setting up Microsoft Dynamics can be complex and time-consuming. Others have suggested lowering the price and improving the interface. Oracle Fusion Service is praised for its seamless integration, stability, scalability, and reliable technical assistance. However, some users had trouble creating new accounts, and many found the solution expensive.
"My access to Microsoft Dynamics CRM is limited, so I can only access the feature of registering the pipeline and activities. That feature is enough for me to do the job, and is what I find most valuable in the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics CRM has to be its interface...Microsoft Dynamics CRM has a user-friendly platform."
"The solution is versatile and customizable."
"The solution's return on investment is worth it."
"The most useful feature that this solution provides is the ability to make dashboards for the business easily as our company is managed using KPIs and metrics."
"Compared to other partners, the most valuable aspect of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is its intuitive APIs, which are customizable and allow for the addition of multiple parameters and attributes. This feature enhances the purpose call in our services. Additionally, the learning curve for contact center agents using Microsoft Dynamics CRM is shorter than with other solution providers. Finally, the commercial aspects of Microsoft Dynamics CRM are superior to those of other solution providers."
"The way it effectively works with the array of other Microsoft tools, such as Azure, is valuable. It works very well with the use of data linking and things like that. Overall, it is a great overall tool to have an effective understanding of the transactional background of each of our customers."
"Technical support is completely good."
"It offers a seamless experience with quick deployment—eliminating prolonged implementation and installation processes."
"The product's most valuable feature is an efficient fusion of finance and HR modules."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that a company can maintain all of its HR data without any issues."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that customers can easily understand it."
"Previously, my clients used a smaller ERP system, not a major one. However, they have now transitioned to Oracle, which provides them with a more extensive range of options. Unlike before, it's now an integrated system that covers various aspects, including finance, supply chain management, and other functionalities."
"Oracle offers a wide range of applications, each capable of delivering significant value to our business."
"The solution is completely cloud-based and very easy to access from anywhere."
"Oracle Cloud Services integrates well. It has lots of APIs to integrate with other solutions, like the PBX we use from Cisco. The ability to integrate Siebel data with Cisco PBX was nice."
"This CRM system needs to be more configurable. Its performance still needs improvement, because its screens hang while querying data. It's also not highly scalable, so scalability also needs improvement."
"The performance could be improved."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM would be far superior if it had an analytical dashboard and AI-based systems."
"The installation was difficult. I'm not the person that implements the solution. However, to have the solution function in the correct way, the process can be difficult."
"It is difficult to qualify opportunity in Microsoft Dynamics CRM."
"Out of the box, the solution doesn't really have a desirable user experience. We have to set it up and customize it to meet our needs."
"The solution's interface has room for improvement."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM could improve by being more user-friendly and having a better design. I have used Service Desk and it is not user-friendly but this solution is worse. The graphical interface is not intuitive, you need someone to guide you or you will have difficulties navigating around to find the file you need. The data we are normally dealing with is boring enough and the interface could be more attractive and more exciting. The tabs and arrangement could be done better to be more user-friendly. Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, and Word are fine and Microsoft should extend their user-friendliness and intuitiveness to Microsoft Dynamics."
"Delivering the solution to clients can be quite complex and requires highly trained technicians with expertise."
"Oracle Fusion Service needs to improve its documentation part because we do not have proper documentation."
"Oracle changed the means by which users are created in the system. I would like this to be easier to implement."
"We built some custom code to make a few functions easier. Oracle needs to look at what the customers do and integrate them into the product."
"The dependency on the dollar makes these products more costly during disruptions in currency parity, especially in countries like Pakistan."
"Oracle Service Cloud could improve the integration for older platforms."
"Oracle counts users for licensing purposes, regardless of their roles or usage patterns. This process could be better."
"One suggestion I have is to shorten the IT team's response time. When we submit an ASR or similar request, it takes a while to receive a response, and this can be seen as a drawback."
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is ranked 1st in CRM Customer Engagement Centers with 68 reviews while Oracle Fusion Service is ranked 5th in CRM Customer Engagement Centers with 29 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics CRM is rated 7.6, while Oracle Fusion Service is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics CRM writes "Intuitive APIs, customizable design, but dashboards could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Service writes "A reasonably stable and scalable tool to manage human resources, payroll, and expenses of a business". Microsoft Dynamics CRM is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, SAP CRM, ServiceNow, Siebel CRM and monday.com, whereas Oracle Fusion Service is most compared with QuickBase, Siebel CRM, Oracle CX Sales, Salesforce Sales Cloud and Sales Creatio. See our Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Oracle Fusion Service report.
See our list of best CRM Customer Engagement Centers vendors, best Marketing Management vendors, and best CRM vendors.
We monitor all CRM Customer Engagement Centers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
