Oracle Access Manager vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Access Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (3rd), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (8th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 7.7%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Upendar G

Senior Consultant at Wipro Limited

Efficiently manage applications with secure single sign-on and streamlined operations

Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access. Its ability to consolidate applications on a single interface streamlines operations significantly. The product is highly secure and reliable, especially in managing user access across various platforms. Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring additional verification steps.

Read full review

MAHESHKUMAR7

Cyber Security Engineer at TECHMINDZ DIGITAL CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED

Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols

A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."

"Overall, I rate Oracle Access Manager nine out of ten for its extensive capabilities."

"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"I find the authentication module, authentication scheme, and security policy most useful in Oracle Access Manager."

"I rate Oracle Access Manager a nine out of ten."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"I work on the application onboarding process because we have multiple customers and get data from different sources."

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

"There are problems with stability."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface."

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."

"The solution's lifecycle management is troublesome. Also, another area of issue in the solution is the part involving documentation of certain features."

"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"We had issues with the stability."

"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a little expensive."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The tool is affordable."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Access Manager?

The product supports customization.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Comparisons

Compared 49% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 19% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 18% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Oracle Access Manager

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Ping Identity Platform

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform