Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs WorkloadWisdom comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (6th), Load Testing Tools (5th)
WorkloadWisdom
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Storage Performance (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and WorkloadWisdom aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is designed for Performance Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 6.2%, up 6.0% compared to last year.
WorkloadWisdom, on the other hand, focuses on Storage Performance, holds 12.0% mindshare.
Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)6.2%
Apache JMeter12.1%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.1%
Other69.6%
Performance Testing Tools
Storage Performance Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
WorkloadWisdom12.0%
EXAScaler19.6%
DataCore SANsymphony17.4%
Other51.0%
Storage Performance
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2668566 - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Ensures high performance and adaptability while providing room for improved analytics and support
The analytics and reporting features can be improved, though they are good enough. If you have expertise, you can manage with what is included. However, it could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities. When considering areas for improvement in OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), there is a need for automated analysis and code-level support.
Use WorkloadWisdom?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Performing Arts
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise73
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
Regarding negative sides or areas for improvement, I do not see any disadvantages so far. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) might have some drawbacks, but I did no...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
Workload Wisdom, Load DynamiX, Load DynamiX Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
New York Presbyterian Hospital, Oracle, Riverbed Technology, Hitachi, F5 Networks, Exinda, Avere Systems, Nationwide, Firehost, Go Daddy
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Perforce, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: February 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.