OpenText Functional Testing and Qualibrate compete in software testing and automation. OpenText leads with a comprehensive toolset, while Qualibrate's intuitive design and innovative features offer an edge on usability and value.
Features: OpenText excels with robust automation, integration capabilities, and adaptability in complex environments. Qualibrate simplifies the testing process with a scriptless interface and strong collaboration tools, enhancing ease of use.
Room for Improvement: OpenText may benefit from streamlined user interfaces to ease the technical complexity for new users. Expanding support for emerging technologies can also enhance its adaptability. Enhancing the speed of support response times could improve user experiences. Qualibrate could improve by expanding feature sets to match more comprehensive tools, enhancing scalability for larger organizations, and offering more advanced customization options for diverse user needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers extensive deployment options but requires significant configuration and expertise. Customer service is thorough but can be slow. Qualibrate’s cloud-based implementation allows for quick deployment with streamlined interfaces, and its support is known for promptness, improving user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher initial setup costs but provides long-term ROI with its robust features, though its complexity can be a barrier. Qualibrate ensures rapid ROI with a lower entry cost, driven by its user-friendly design and effective integrations, appealing to businesses seeking faster implementation without heavy financial outlay.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
