OpenText Functional Testing vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

9,762 Views
6,833 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] review

0% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing and Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL compete in automated testing solutions. OpenText seems to have the upper hand in customer support, while Perforce is favored for its unique features.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers robust automation capabilities, integration with various development environments, and advanced technical assistance. Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL provides a user-friendly script editor, broad protocol support, and easily adaptable scripting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing provides a cloud-based deployment model suited to modern IT infrastructures with efficient support channels. Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL features straightforward on-premise deployment but offers limited support services.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing involves higher setup costs but promises a quick ROI with enhanced automation features. Perforce QA Wizard Pro EOL features a lower initial cost but may have delayed ROI due to discontinued status and fewer support updates.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,855 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Has supported faster test execution and increased flexibility while offering room to improve support responsiveness

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates another day of delay to get to the level that's needed. This is a common practice across most companies where you call, you get the entry-level person, and then they work their way up to help screen calls so that they are more focused.

Read full review

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test."

"Micro Focus UFT One gives us integration capabilities with both API and GUI components. I like the user interface. It doesn't require that much skill to use and has automatic settings, which is useful for users who don't know what to select. It also has dark and light themes."

"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications, and it is very productive in terms of execution."

"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."

"The inside object repository is nice. We can use that and learn it through the ALM connection. That's a good feature. The reporting and smart identification features are also excellent."

"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."

"OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier."

"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

Cons

"There are scenarios where the tool freezes and locks the user out."

"I don't like this tool and I don't think that it's a successful example for automation."

"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."

"Prior to the past three years, we saw a lot of issues with stability and a lot of patching and concern from our internal customers that they couldn't rely on the tool to always be there when they needed it."

"One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all."

"I would not recommend this solution to others who are considering it."

"The UA objects are sometimes hard to recognize, so the coverage should be increased. Open-source alternatives have a broad scope. Also, it's sometimes difficult to make connections between two of the components in the UFT mobile center. It should be easier to set up the wireless solution because we have to set both. We directly integrate Selenium and APM, so we should try to cover all the features they have in APM and Selenium with the UFT mobile."

"The initial setup is complex."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"Generally, we can say that we have not had an excellent experience with Perforce."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"The price is reasonable."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	71

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT One?

I'm more familiar with Functional Testing. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers is a different product set that functions as an IDE for writing custom code. We don't leverage that product bec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 32% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 29% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

April 2026

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is an automated testing tool designed to streamline testing processes for software development teams. Its sophisticated features support efficient and comprehensive test management, ensuring high-quality software delivery.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers extensive functionality for software testing that supports both beginners and advanced users. It facilitates script creation, test execution, and result analysis across different scripting environments. QA teams benefit from its flexibility and compatibility, allowing seamless integration into existing workflows.

What are the key features of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]?

Scriptless Testing: Simplifies test creation through a user-friendly interface.
Cross-Platform Testing: Ensures software reliability across multiple platforms.
Integration Support: Enhances efficiency by integrating with existing tools and systems.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed insights into test outcomes for informed decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts, saving time.
Comprehensive Testing: Identifies bugs earlier, minimizing future costs.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing needs with ease.
Improved Software Quality: Ensures consistent performance and functionality.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] sees widespread use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail due to its ability to handle complex testing scenarios. Its flexibility allows it to meet the demanding requirements of these industries, supporting a wide range of applications and ensuring robust software performance.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,855 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.