OpenText Functional Testing and Panaya Test Dynamix compete in the software testing category, where Panaya Test Dynamix takes the lead in terms of features, while OpenText stands out for its pricing and support.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers robust test automation and integration tools, which are highly effective for managing complex testing environments. It supports various technologies, benefiting users who require versatile solutions. Panaya Test Dynamix, however, provides advanced analytics and comprehensive test management capabilities, making it suitable for users needing thorough oversight and detailed reporting. Its feature richness outshines others in terms of functionality.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its analytics and reporting functionalities to match the depth that Panaya Test Dynamix offers. Additionally, improving user interface customization and expanding browser support could broaden its usability. Panaya Test Dynamix would benefit from refining customer service response times and offering more competitive pricing. Simplifying its deployment procedures could also improve user satisfaction, especially for businesses new to cloud solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing provides flexible deployment options and efficient customer support, contributing to its fast implementation times. In contrast, Panaya Test Dynamix excels with a cloud-based deployment model that simplifies setup, though it sometimes struggles with customer service responsiveness. The customer service strength of OpenText enhances its deployment appeal.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is generally more cost-effective, offering competitive pricing that ensures a strong return on investment due to rapid issue resolution. Panaya Test Dynamix, with its extensive feature set, requires a higher initial investment, making ROI more contingent on fully leveraging its capabilities. OpenText's affordability and immediate ROI appeal to budget-conscious buyers.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| Panaya Test Dynamix | 1.5% |
| Other | 89.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.
With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
