OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs Spot by Flexera comparison

OpenText and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. OpenText is ranked #40, while Spot - A Flexera company is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Spot - A Flexera company’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

518 Views
435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spot by Flexera

Read 5 Spot by Flexera reviews

1,639 Views
590 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Spot by Flexera

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 19, 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and Spot by Flexera are competing in cloud management. OpenText excels in service responsiveness, while Spot by Flexera offers a feature-rich experience with cost-centric innovations.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation offers robust orchestration tools, scalability, and lifecycle management. Spot by Flexera includes automated cost optimization, advanced Kubernetes management, and intelligent autoscaling engine.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve in multi-cloud integration, real-time analytics, and enhancing user interface design. Spot by Flexera could benefit from more customization options, improved onboarding resources, and customer feedback integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Spot by Flexera's deployment is user-friendly with seamless integration and strong support channels.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers a cost-effective setup with impressive ROI due to efficient service delivery. Spot by Flexera initially costs more but achieves superior ROI through advanced cost-saving features.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Spot by Flexera Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Spot by Flexera

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spot by Flexera

Ranking in Cloud Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Virtualization Software (14th), Cloud Operations Analytics (1st), Cloud Analytics (2nd), Compute Service (9th), Containers as a Service (CaaS) (4th), Cloud Cost Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spot by Flexera is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Spot	1.7%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	1.0%
Other	97.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Karan Saini

Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees

Intelligent autoscaling has cut compute costs and now manages ephemeral workloads efficiently

I think overall Spot is quite good. The UI is powerful, but it can feel a bit dense for some new users. More guided onboarding would help teams adopt advanced features faster, and deeper insights into Kubernetes resource usage would be beneficial. Overall, it is a really good platform that is quite mature and stable. I chose a rating of nine because it may sometimes be a bit overwhelming for newcomers, and there are also a few areas in which the EKS Kubernetes level granularity is a little missing. Overall, I think Spot is a really good and stable tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

"My compute costs have reduced, capacity and production output have increased, and my overhead for maintaining custom scripts or doing some of the tasks manually has been saved."

"The solution helps us to manage and scale automatically whenever there is a limit to the increase in the application workflow."

"Cost saving is the main benefit, and the manual effort required for reviewing and purchasing savings plans and other RIs is something we do not have to manage manually now, as we get automatic suggestions from Spot."

"Spot has positively impacted our organization by automating cloud resource management, which has significantly cut costs and improved efficiency."

"The solution offers both block access and file access, making it a nice solution for customers."

Cons

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"The solution doesn't have support from OCI, and it should start working to onboard OCI."

"There are no particular areas for improvement I can identify."

"I have not seen a return on investment yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Spot Ocean?

The solution helps us to manage and scale automatically whenever there is a limit to the increase in the application workflow.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spot Ocean?

Spot can be improved by adding deeper multi-cloud integrations, enhancing real-time security automation, and continuously making advancements based on customer feedback.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spot Ocean?

I have been using Spot for five years. My main use case for Spot is cloud optimization.We use Spot for optimization by leveraging real-time optimization as well as auto-optimization. The company al...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 36% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 24% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 19% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

IBM Turbonomic vs Spot by Flexera

Compared 11% of the time

ProsperOps vs Spot by Flexera

Compared 6% of the time

Pump.co vs Spot by Flexera

Compared 6% of the time

CAST AI vs Spot by Flexera

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Spot by Flexera

Compared 4% of the time

More Spot by Flexera Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

January 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Spot by Flexera

January 2026

Download Spot by Flexera product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Spot Ocean, Spot Elastigroup, Spot Eco

Overview

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

Spot by Flexera provides automated cost optimization and container management with multi-cloud integration, achieving up to 70% savings and greater efficiency. It adapts to demand changes using AI-driven insights.

Spot enables organizations to optimize cloud infrastructure in environments such as Kubernetes, AKS, EKS, and AWS. It offers advanced automation features for managing resources, leading to reduced overhead and increased production output. Spot's intelligent autoscaling and node replacement capabilities enhance scalability and reliability. While the platform lacks some granularity in EKS Kubernetes insights, it remains stable and mature, helping organizations minimize costs and improve resource utilization. Opportunities for improvement include OCI support, more detailed multi-cloud integrations, and enhanced Kubernetes insights.

What features does Spot by Flexera offer?

Automated Cost Optimization: Efficiently manages expenditure and provides significant savings.
Advanced Container Management: Streamlines container management across multiple platforms.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with major cloud providers.
Intelligent Autoscaling: Automatically adjusts resources based on demand changes.
Zero-Downtime Node Replacement: Ensures seamless transitions without interrupting workflows.
Integration with AWS: Enhances scalability and system reliability.

What are the benefits of using Spot by Flexera?

Cost Efficiency: Achieves up to 70% cost savings through intelligent solutions.
Increased Production Output: Improves overall productivity by streamlining processes.
Scalability and Reliability: Offers robust autoscaling and no-downtime node replacement.
Support for Financial Governance: Aids in effective financial management and planning.

In industries heavily reliant on cloud-based services, Spot by Flexera is crucial for optimizing resource management and cost efficiency. Organizations leveraging Spot in sectors like technology and finance benefit from real-time optimization techniques and improved governance processes.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Freshworks, Zalando, Red Spark, News, Trax, ETAS, Demandbase, BeesWa, Duolingo, intel, IBM, N26, Wix, EyeEm, moovit, SAMSUNG, News UK, ticketmaster

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Spot by Flexera

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Spot by Flexera

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Spot by Flexera and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. Spot by Flexera report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.