OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

OpenText and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #40, while Zeenyx is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. OpenText holds a 0.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

132 Views
37 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

377 Views
83 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Zeenyx AscentialTest compete in the realm of software testing tools. OpenText is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and support, while Zeenyx is favored for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers robust process automation and integration capabilities, supporting seamless workflow management. It enables test development to be separated from automation development, encouraging broader participation in test creation. Zeenyx AscentialTest provides strong scripting support, comprehensive test automation features, and the ability to capture snapshots for creating application object libraries. It allows flexible execution of tests across virtual machines, enhancing test efficiency.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could benefit from enhancing its user interface and expanding integration options with other software tools. Improving documentation clarity and offering more training resources could also be advantageous. Zeenyx could work on flattening its learning curve for new users, making enhancements to the reporting features more intuitive, and expanding third-party integrations to accommodate diverse infrastructure needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and support, integrating easily within existing environments. Zeenyx provides a flexible deployment model adapted to various infrastructures but may require a steeper learning curve. Despite this, Zeenyx approaches customer service with personalized support options that cater to tailored assistance needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing is known for its lower upfront setup cost, providing substantial ROI through scalable solutions and rapid implementation. Zeenyx AscentialTest involves a higher initial cost but delivers significant ROI due to its superior feature set and extensive test coverage. The strategic choice between lower initial expenses versus long-term comprehensive returns characterizes their pricing differences.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

40th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."

"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."

"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Healthcare Company

20%

Government

13%

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?

AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?

While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?

We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 100% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

June 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

May 2025

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

AscentialTest

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.