Parasoft Development Testing Platform and OpenText Application Quality Management are competitors in the application quality improvement category through testing solutions. Parasoft is often seen as having the edge due to its comprehensive features and robust support, while OpenText is favored for its flexibility and configurability.
Features: Parasoft Development Testing Platform includes automated static analysis, API testing, and integration with CI/CD tools. OpenText Application Quality Management offers advanced test management features, supports multiple testing types like performance and security, and allows integration with various testing methodologies.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft Development Testing Platform might benefit from enhanced user interface design, improved scalability options, and additional integration with third-party tools. OpenText Application Quality Management could improve by offering more detailed analytics, streamlined support processes, and better user onboarding experiences.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management is flexible, providing both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options along with dedicated support. Parasoft Development Testing Platform focuses on a streamlined onboarding process and strong technical support. OpenText's flexibility suits various enterprises, while Parasoft is known for excellent customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft Development Testing Platform generally has a higher initial setup cost but potentially better ROI through effective testing automation. OpenText Application Quality Management's pricing is competitive with scalable features for those seeking cost-effectiveness. Parasoft requires larger upfront investment but offers long-term savings, while OpenText provides an economical option without losing essential testing capabilities.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t. Includes:
- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards
- Preconfigured compliance reporting
- Customized Advanced Analytics
- Interactive Navigation of Results
- Traceability
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
