Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

OpenText and Parasoft are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Parasoft is ranked #20. OpenText holds a 4.6% mindshare in ALM, compared to Parasoft’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText Application Qualit...
Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews
  • 5,597 Views
  • 3,470 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
Parasoft Development Testin...
Read 4 Parasoft Development Testing Platform reviews
  • 549 Views
  • 340 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Parasoft Development Testing Platform and OpenText Application Quality Management compete in the software testing sector, offering solutions to enhance application quality. OpenText is noted for its comprehensive features, making it a preferred choice despite its higher price.

Features: Parasoft Development Testing Platform offers automated testing, code analysis, and code coverage. OpenText Application Quality Management provides lifecycle management, extensive test management capabilities, and robust API.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft could enhance its integration with third-party tools, improve its user interface, and provide more detailed reporting options. OpenText could benefit from streamlining its deployment process, improving its cost-effectiveness, and expanding its community support and resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, suitable for immediate integration. OpenText, with a detailed deployment model, requires time for implementation but offers comprehensive deployment support for thorough quality management needs.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for its affordable setup cost and quick ROI, appealing to budget-conscious companies. OpenText Application Quality Management's higher cost is balanced by its long-term value in large-scale enterprise scenarios, offering significant ROI for committed investments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText Application Quality Management boosts efficiency and testing practices, delivering positive ROI through improved traceability and collaboration.
Sentiment score
6.8
The Parasoft Development Testing Platform improved code quality, reduced bugs, saved resources, and increased profitability by enhancing compliance and efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
OpenText's customer service is generally helpful but inconsistent, with mixed feedback on responsiveness and technical support effectiveness.
Sentiment score
6.0
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for knowledgeable, prompt support, effective communication, and helpful documentation, ensuring excellent customer service.
Technical support has been excellent.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Hosney Osman
Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
GS
Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText Application Quality Management excels in scalability, adapts to demands, but faces challenges with licensing and performance in large, agile projects.
Sentiment score
5.4
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for its scalability, seamless integration, and robustness in handling large, complex projects.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText Application Quality Management is stable but faces occasional performance issues, hardware reliance, and requires frequent upgrades.
Sentiment score
6.9
Parasoft Development Testing Platform is praised for its stability, reliability, seamless integration, excellent support, and efficient performance under varied conditions.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText Application Quality Management needs improved reporting, lower costs, better usability, Agile support, and enhanced integration with other tools.
Parasoft Development Testing Platform requires better integration, documentation, performance optimization, training resources, frequent updates, and responsive technical support.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
Huong Vuong
Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
reviewer1477047
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
Huong Vuong - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

OpenText Application Quality Management is costly but offers flexible licensing, better suited for large enterprises to manage budget constraints.
Parasoft Development Testing Platform offers comprehensive capabilities with flexible pricing, noted for higher costs but robust support and training.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
 

Valuable Features

OpenText AQ Management provides robust integration, customization, and scalability for enhanced global collaboration and efficient test management.
Users praise Parasoft for its strong reporting, automation, CI/CD integration, vulnerability detection, and customizable, intuitive workflows enhancing code quality.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
reviewer1564011
President at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
reviewer1477047
Senior Test Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Application Quality Management report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft Development Testing Platform report
GS
reviewer1564011 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer1477047 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
4th
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Quality Management Software (3rd)
Parasoft Development Testin...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
20th
Ranking in Test Management Tools
26th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 4.6%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Development Testing Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management4.6%
Parasoft Development Testing Platform1.1%
Other94.3%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

GS
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
Manages multiple releases seamlessly
We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.
Read full review
ES
Edmund Suarez
Sr. Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable
We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests Our customers require that we perform static analysis and have no critical high errors. We must also have 100 percent code coverage for my test to verify that everything is good and…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Performing Arts
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise161
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 11% of the time
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 10% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 9% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors
PractiTest vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform Logo
PractiTest vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform
Compared 55% of the time
Jira vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform Logo
Jira vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform
Compared 45% of the time
More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
December 2025
OpenText Application Quality Management reportDownload OpenText Application Quality Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
December 2025
Parasoft Development Testing Platform reportDownload Parasoft Development Testing Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
 

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?
  • Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
  • Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
  • Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
  • Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
  • Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
  • Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
  • Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Parasoft
 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform
December 2025
Free Report: OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.