Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OneTrust GRC vs ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OneTrust GRC
Ranking in GRC
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (3rd)
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Ranking in GRC
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the GRC category, the mindshare of OneTrust GRC is 3.4%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OneTrust GRC3.4%
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0.4%
Other96.2%
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

Gerald Pegg - PeerSpot reviewer
Governance Risk and Compliance Coordinator at HUB International
Streamlined incident management with user-friendly automation tools and responsive support
I use OneTrust specifically for incident management. For my company, I helped to create the incident management program that we currently use, particularly with gathering the information and sending out assessments to different vendors to collect information for further research and discovery.  I…
Yash Bawane - PeerSpot reviewer
Data engineer at tcs
Enhancing decision-making with automation and integration capabilities
Overall, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier is powerful, but there are some areas for improvement. A few areas could be better; first, the learning curve is steep for new users, and a guided onboarding or tutorial would help. Second, report customization could be more flexible so different teams can see exactly what they need. Additionally, handling very large data sets can slow down occasionally, so performance optimization would be helpful. Finally, adding more predictive analytics or AI-driven insights could automatically highlight unusual risks or trends without manual analysis. We mostly work on data, so we face many challenges with large data sets when using ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier. When you feed very large data sets into RQ, such as hundreds of applications and thousands of vulnerabilities, the performance can sometimes slow down during scoring or dashboard updates. It doesn't break, but processing can take longer than expected. This is mostly unnoticeable during bulk imports or complex scenario analysis, so planning updates during off-peak hours or breaking data into smaller batches can help. Overall, it's reliable, but performance could be improved for very large-scale data and environments. It would be great to have more interactive dashboards that let users drill down easily without leaving the main view. Another useful addition could be automated alerts or notifications when risk scores change significantly, so the team doesn't have to check a dashboard constantly. Lastly, more built-in guidance or AI tips for interpreting FAIR-based metrics could help new users to get up to speed faster. Overall, the tool is strong, but these additions would make it even more efficient and user-friendly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it already has visibility about all the data protection regulations or other cybersecurity regulations related to several countries"
"As a solution for IT risks, it is a very good product."
"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."
"It does help in the automation of our privacy impact assessments."
"OneTrust GRC is stable."
"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."
"We receive notifications or cases and prioritize them accordingly, which helps us address issues promptly."
"The privacy impact assessment automation tool and the incident management tool are very user-friendly."
"ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier definitely saves our time and money, for example, manual risk reporting time dropped by around 60% to 70% since the dashboard and automated scoring handle most calculations."
"With ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, our team can respond much faster because risks are quantified and prioritized automatically, so we know what to tackle first."
"ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier has positively impacted both our organization and our customers' organizations by improving how we prioritize and manage risk scores across multiple clients."
"ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier has positively impacted both our organization and our customers' organizations by improving how we prioritize and manage risk scores across multiple clients."
 

Cons

"The platform was not built in a way that allowed multinational entities to use it seamlessly."
"There are several areas for improvement. One is the integration capability. Connecting various DSAR systems can be time-consuming if a single integration takes months to complete."
"I haven't seen any return on investment using the solution. If I had the opportunity, I would use a different solution."
"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."
"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."
"The product is not that easy to set up."
"The implementation of OneTrust could have been smoother, particularly in terms of scoping for those outside of governance, risk, and compliance."
"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."
"When you feed very large data sets into RQ, such as hundreds of applications and thousands of vulnerabilities, the performance can sometimes slow down during scoring or dashboard updates."
"The user interface for multiple clients and large-scale deployment should be improved because we have observed sluggishness when navigating between clients and assets, and it takes time to resolve."
"The user interface for multiple clients and large-scale deployment should be improved because we have observed sluggishness when navigating between clients and assets, and it takes time to resolve."
"When you feed very large data sets into RQ, such as hundreds of applications and thousands of vulnerabilities, the performance can sometimes slow down during scoring or dashboard updates."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OneTrust GRC's licensing costs about $15,000 per module."
"The solution is expensive."
"OneTrust GRC is an expensive solution."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is too expensive, I rate the solution a seven since it falls under the pricey side."
"I found the pricing and setup cost very reasonable."
"The platform is expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Government
7%
Retailer
7%
Media Company
59%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OneTrust GRC?
We have data from Jira regarding addiction related to Europe as well as California. Additionally, we have data related to the Indian Data Protection Bill. Therefore, GDPR compliance is highly benef...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneTrust GRC?
I don't have specifics on pricing. I know it's not very cheap, but the budget aspect is outside my wheelhouse.
What needs improvement with OneTrust GRC?
I wish there were more customization options, particularly within the privacy rights automation module. More customization on the backend would allow for adjusting specific category labels tailored...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier is overall good because the pricing is reasonable for the value it provides. Though it's not the cheapest opt...
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier?
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier can be improved by making the scenario modeling and reporting more interactive and customizable, allowing analysts to quickly adjust parameters and visualize what-if o...
What is your primary use case for ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier?
ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier serves as my main tool in my current organization. In my current organization, we use ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier to prioritize vulnerabilities and threats across mu...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

OneTrust Vendor Risk Management
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

randstand, into, halfbrick
Customer Case Studies and Use Cases
Find out what your peers are saying about OneTrust GRC vs. ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.