AuditBoard vs OneTrust GRC comparison

AuditBoard and OneTrust are both solutions in the GRC category. AuditBoard is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while OneTrust is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. AuditBoard holds a 7.4% mindshare in G, compared to OneTrust’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 78% of OneTrust users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,535 Views
768 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OneTrust GRC

Read 14 OneTrust GRC reviews

2,310 Views
1,181 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

OneTrust GRC

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

OneTrust GRC and AuditBoard both compete in the governance, risk, and compliance domain, offering unique strengths tailored to different needs. While OneTrust GRC offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform mainly for privacy and IT risk management, AuditBoard stands out in audit management, excelling in document and workflow management.

Features: OneTrust GRC shines with its ability to manage privacy programs and IT risks using built-in templates for GDPR and ISO compliance. It goes beyond third-party vendor tracking, integrating privacy impact assessments and incident management tools. AuditBoard enhances audit management with efficient documentation and workflow management features, real-time work paper editing, robust community tools, and customizable reporting options.

Room for Improvement: OneTrust GRC's workflow automation and scope outside IT risk management could improve, as well as its setup and scalability for larger enterprises. AuditBoard could enhance its customization potential, module integration, survey functions, and communication of system updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneTrust GRC is available on multiple cloud platforms with customer support that varies in response speed, hindered by a complex workflow. AuditBoard offers diverse deployment options and consistent, quick support with strong self-help resources that help maintain efficient response times.

Pricing and ROI: OneTrust GRC's pricing is viewed as expensive but flexible for enterprises, yielding significant ROI through comprehensive automation. AuditBoard has a straightforward pricing model with limits based on control numbers, which could lead to additional costs without negotiation. Both offer substantial ROI, with user preferences depending on negotiation skills and requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 833,108 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneTrust GRC

Ranking in GRC

2nd

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 7.4%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneTrust GRC is 8.8%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC

Featured Reviews

Abhishek Singhal

MS Financial Risk Management at University of Connecticut Health Center

Effective real-time editing, helpful support, and effortlessly implementation

AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform. The lagging issue was related to the stability and functionality of the search engine. It seems some minor adjustments were necessary to enhance the overall experience and allow for a clearer distinction between the controls being used. This problem also seemed to arise when attempting to upload external files or engage in other similar activities. After careful contemplation, having a centralized storage system for all work-related documents would be incredibly advantageous. This could be in the form of folders or an online cloud that is easily accessible through the AuditBoard website. This would eliminate the need for me to store these important documents on my personal computer or the need to access them through my desktop. Having everything in one centralized location would not only make my life easier, but it would also increase productivity and efficiency in my work.

Read full review

Gerald Pegg

Governance Risk and Compliance Coordinator at HUB International

Streamlined incident management with user-friendly automation tools and responsive support

I use OneTrust specifically for incident management. For my company, I helped to create the incident management program that we currently use, particularly with gathering the information and sending out assessments to different vendors to collect information for further research and discovery. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

"There are lots of features."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

More AuditBoard pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it already has visibility about all the data protection regulations or other cybersecurity regulations related to several countries"

"The product helps us streamline audit and incident management processes."

"The privacy impact assessment automation tool and the incident management tool are very user-friendly."

"One of the valuable features of this solution is it has the ability to review fourth and fifth parties to the nth degree."

"OneTrust GRC offers policy management, including documentation, distribution, attestation, and policy management."

"Vendors can be assessed and rated out of the tool, and assessments can be scheduled for updates at certain intervals."

"The simplicity of OneTrust GRC, particularly its user interface, is valuable as it makes it easy to use and not complex."

"One of the most beneficial features of the product has been its cloud-based IT and vendor risk management tools, along with built-in templates for GDPR and ISO compliance."

More OneTrust GRC pros

Cons

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"They should improve the solution's test sheets feature for ease of use."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

More AuditBoard cons

"OneTrust GRC's workflows aren't automated and need to be manually driven."

"I wish there were more customization options, particularly within the privacy rights automation module."

"The implementation of OneTrust could have been smoother, particularly in terms of scoping for those outside of governance, risk, and compliance."

"They could improve by offering free help. A solution, a lot of times, is not just the use of the solution. For example, it is the overall engagement, how well do they support the system, what is their SLA, and how long their response time is to an issue. It would be beneficial if they had some type of professional services where they offer the first five hours of professional services a year for free. That would be a substantial benefit rather than having to buy professional services or professional services packages."

"The product is not that easy to set up."

"The platform was not built in a way that allowed multinational entities to use it seamlessly."

"We encounter difficulties creating multiple platforms or interfaces and manual processes for changing certain settings."

"There are several areas for improvement. One is the integration capability. Connecting various DSAR systems can be time-consuming if a single integration takes months to complete."

More OneTrust GRC cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"OneTrust GRC's licensing costs about $15,000 per module."

"The solution is expensive."

"I found the pricing and setup cost very reasonable."

"The platform is expensive."

"OneTrust GRC is an expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is too expensive, I rate the solution a seven since it falls under the pricey side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

833,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuditBoard?

I believe the license is based on the number of key controls that will be tested regularly. You can also pay extra for additional modules, like risk testing and operational audits, etc.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What do you like most about OneTrust GRC?

We have data from Jira regarding addiction related to Europe as well as California. Additionally, we have data related to the Indian Data Protection Bill. Therefore, GDPR compliance is highly benef...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneTrust GRC?

I don't have specifics on pricing. I know it's not very cheap, but the budget aspect is outside my wheelhouse.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OneTrust GRC?

I wish there were more customization options, particularly within the privacy rights automation module. More customization on the backend would allow for adjusting specific category labels tailored...

See all answers

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 46% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 20% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

RSA Archer vs OneTrust GRC

Compared 28% of the time

ProcessUnity vs OneTrust GRC

Compared 20% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs OneTrust GRC

Compared 9% of the time

Bitsight vs OneTrust GRC

Compared 7% of the time

Aravo vs OneTrust GRC

Compared 5% of the time

More OneTrust GRC Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

February 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

OneTrust GRC

January 2025

Download OneTrust GRC product report

Also Known As

No data available

OneTrust Vendor Risk Management

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

OneTrust is the largest and most widely used technology platform to operationalize privacy, security and third-party risk management. More than 2,500 customers, both big and small and across 100 countries, use OneTrust to demonstrate compliance with privacy regulations including the GDPR, California Consumer Privacy Act, Brazil LGPD, and hundreds of the world's privacy laws.

OneTrust's size and scale allows it to offer the easiest-to-use and most affordable solution for implementing use cases including: Privacy Maturity Benchmarking, Data Protection by Design and Default (PbD), Data Protection Impact Assessments (PIA/DPIA), Third-Party Vendor Risk Management, Incident and Breach Response, Data Mapping (Records of Processing), Customer Preference Management, Consent Management, Website Scanning & Cookie Compliance, Mobile App Scanning, Data Subject/Consumer Rights Management and Policy & Notice Management.

The platform's intelligence comes from DataGuidance by OneTrust, an in-depth and up-to-date source of privacy and security regulatory summaries, guidance, templates, case law, and analysis. The database is updated daily by over 20 in-house privacy researchers, along with a network of 500 lawyers across over 300 jurisdictions.

OneTrust's 700 employees are located across co-headquarters in Atlanta and in London with additional locations in Bangalore, Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Munich and Hong Kong. To learn more, visit OneTrust.com.

OneTrust

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

randstand, into, halfbrick

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC

January 2025

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

833,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. OneTrust GRC report.

See our list of best GRC vendors and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.