No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NoPaperForms vs Sage CRM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NoPaperForms
Ranking in CRM
42nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sage CRM
Ranking in CRM
27th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of NoPaperForms is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sage CRM is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sage CRM0.7%
NoPaperForms0.4%
Other98.9%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2209905 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director Category Management at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees
End-to-end sales calling solution for us but dashboard is not very intuitive
The dashboard is not very intuitive. You need to store the number of dials made on a particular lead, then the number of dials after it connects, and then the number of conversions. We typically move all this data to our database and build dashboards on top of that. Our in-house central logistics team builds dashboards on top of NoPaperForms data, which are more intuitive and help us make better decisions. NoPaperForms doesn't track lead activity in the detail we expect. In future, I would want NoPaperForms to store the number of dials we're making on a particular lead. A lot of lead activity details should be there as part of the lead activity dashboard. Storing all the details related to lead activity would definitely help them build better dashboards. I would ideally want them to work on their automation. The team has to manually put filters on the lead activity or stages and then manually push leads into a campaign where counsellors are calling or receiving calls. LeadSquared (LSQ) provides a feature where you can put all of these automations. Based on lead activity, you can put a lot of these automations, and then the campaign will be automatically assigned. It will reduce a lot of manual effort.
VK
Deputy Manager - IT at Nidec Corporation
Useful to access data anytime and helpful in generating reports quickly
Speaking about the product's ability to improve sales processes, I would say that even though the tool offers project management capabilities along with ERP functionalities, my company doesn't use it for project management or HR-related areas. My company majorly uses the tool for finance, logistics, and inventory control. I haven't had the need for my company to not integrate the tool with other products. Though my company uses the product separately, we can export Sage CRM into Excel, after which the data can be integrated with other software products. Though the tool can be integrated with other products, my company doesn't do it because Sage CRM is enough for us. The analytical reporting part of the business product is good. The analytical reporting part of the product is used for financial years, along with the profit and loss reports and inventory reports. For the sales part in our company, we use the analytical reports generated by the product to help the sales people in a region-wise, sales-wise and product-wise manner. In my company, one of the teams will be changing from Sage CRM to Microsoft Dynamics. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it, especially since it is a tool suitable for medium-sized companies and not for enterprise-sized businesses. Medium-sized companies can use the product since it is an economical and reliable tool. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The feature we like most is Campaign Dial-in, which allows us to churn through 5,000 to 10,000 leads without agents having to dial manually."
"The Sage Accpac solution has definitely been the most valuable because the finance features are excellent."
"The part I like the most is the reporting."
"The quoting feature is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The solution's technical support is fast to respond."
"It has been helpful for opportunity management and lease management."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"The Sage Accpac solution has definitely been the most valuable because the finance features are excellent."
"Sage CRM is flexible, customizable, and user-friendly."
 

Cons

"I would ideally want them to work on their automation. The team has to manually put filters on the lead activity or stages and then manually push leads into a campaign where counsellors are calling or receiving calls."
"With regards to monitoring the transaction with alerts, it could be better."
"Sage CRM doesn't have a dashboard for dynamic reporting."
"With regards to monitoring the transaction with alerts, it could be better."
"The scalability of this solution depends on whether you have a team that can configure it for scale."
"Sage CRM would benefit from improving its interaction with email communication sites and social media platforms in order to gather more leads."
"Its user interface could be better."
"The product could be improved by modernizing the charts and analytics. Additionally, the export features and interactivity of the charts need enhancement."
"From an improvement perspective, the ability to make modifications to the product needs to be more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. It is on the cheaper side."
"Though my company has to have a perpetual license per user, there is a need to make annual payments towards the costs attached to the support my organization receives from Sage CRM's technical team."
"We have a yearly license."
"The product is expensive."
"We pay for eight core modules and 20 user licenses and this costs us $1500 per year."
"From an African perspective, the solution is relatively expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
24%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NoPaperForms?
I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. It is on the cheaper side. There is a variable component depending on your lead volume. NoPaperForms versus...
What needs improvement with NoPaperForms?
The dashboard is not very intuitive. You need to store the number of dials made on a particular lead, then the number of dials after it connects, and then the number of conversions. We typically mo...
What is your primary use case for NoPaperForms?
We use NoPaperForms as a sales CRM for all the leads, calling, and everything. It's a complete end-to-end sales calling solution for us. All our agents work on that tool, and all the leads are in N...
What do you like most about Sage CRM?
The solution's technical support is fast to respond.
What needs improvement with Sage CRM?
The product could be improved by modernizing the charts and analytics. Additionally, the export features and interactivity of the charts need enhancement.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Avis, Fuji Xerox, Formula 1
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Zoho and others in CRM. Updated: March 2026.
886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.