No Magic MagicDraw vs SS&C Blue Prism comparison

Dassault Systèmes and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Dassault Systèmes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Dassault Systèmes holds a 2.4% mindshare in BPD, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Dassault Systèmes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

2,563 Views
2,358 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 10 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

6,391 Views
767 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

No Magic MagicDraw and SS&C Blue Prism compete in software solutions, focusing on modeling and automation respectively. While MagicDraw has an advantage in pricing and customer support, Blue Prism excels in advanced automation, providing significant ROI.

Features: No Magic MagicDraw offers robust modeling capabilities for enterprise architecture, customizable diagrams, and supports model-driven documentation. It follows industry standards for improved interoperability. SS&C Blue Prism provides advanced automation, easy workflow creation, and intuitive user interfaces that simplify process management and automation scaling across various applications.

Room for Improvement: No Magic MagicDraw can improve by enhancing collaboration within teams, providing stronger integration capabilities, and simplifying complex modeling processes. SS&C Blue Prism could focus on reducing setup complexity, offering better documentation for non-technical users, and improving OCR capabilities for non-English languages.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: No Magic MagicDraw streamlines deployment with comprehensive documentation and highly responsive customer service, making it accessible for various users. SS&C Blue Prism involves a more complex setup, requiring technical expertise but its support team offers specialized and effective assistance, beneficial for in-depth queries.

Pricing and ROI: No Magic MagicDraw provides a competitive pricing structure focusing on added value and cost-effectiveness through its extensive features. SS&C Blue Prism presents higher initial costs but delivers substantial ROI through its ability to automate complex workflows, leading to long-term operational efficiency and cost reductions.

To learn more, read our detailed No Magic MagicDraw vs. SS&C Blue Prism Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw vs. SS&C Blue Prism

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Business Process Design

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (9th), Process Automation (10th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (1st), Insurance Claims Processing (1st), Document Management Software (3rd), Low-Code Development Platforms (10th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (6th), Loan Management Software (1st), Document Automation Software (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (11th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (11th), AI Finance & Accounting (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 1.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SS&C Blue Prism	1.6%
No Magic MagicDraw	2.4%
Other	96.0%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Biwod Duncan

Account Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automation has saved thousands of hours by processing bulk data and managing emails efficiently

The best features SS&C Blue Prism offers include powerful automation, easy-to-use process flow, and excellent integration capabilities. Data manipulation and handling is very easy and user-friendly. It is very secure, especially in handling sensitive data such as credentials. One of my favorite features of SS&C Blue Prism that stands out is its seamless integration with various systems. This includes features such as load balancing, encryption, audit, and spying modes. The capability proves to be a significant advantage when automating tasks across different applications and platforms, which saves a lot of time. The email handling feature is spot-on, and we are able to automate these tasks easily, saving a lot of time. SS&C Blue Prism has positively impacted my organization as it can easily handle a large amount of data, being very scalable. It also saves time through automation of email. It saved a considerable amount of time, more than 5,000 hours of manual work so far. It saved a considerable amount of money as well. The costing metrics will improve largely. It also requires very little coding. Instead of hiring new people trained in a specific tool, we were able to manage this with the existing workforce with a few weekend classes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very user-friendly, and the customer service is really good."

"No Magic has the tools and capabilities to model a complete enterprise and all product lines."

"The technical support is very good."

"We use it to build the physical and logical domains to hold requirements, specifications, use cases, and all the way down to class definitions."

"Magic Draw has capabilities that I'm sure I haven't even touched on, but at least for what I'm attempting to achieve, it provides the most capability to meet my needs at this point in time."

"The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface."

"We are getting away from the old ways of writing a lot of papers and requirements documents, architecture documents, technical solution documents, interface documents - those days are gone."

"My advice to anybody who is designing complex projects, like defense projects or space projects, is that they have to use this program or one like it."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

"We have converted manual processes into RPA processes, leading to significant time, money, and quality savings."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

Cons

"The software is a little more challenging if you haven't been trained on how to use it."

"Larger models slow you down; committing, updating, merging of branches and comparing of models (diff) do not scale yet; issues will hopefully be solved with upcoming V19."

"It would be better if the User Interface were updated. At the moment, it's a classic environment. It reminds me of the old Windows interface, for example, Windows 95. It would be better to make it more user-friendly. It would also be better if it could integrate with SAP solutions. It isn't easy to find experts in the field. It's hard to find people around the globe that have the necessary skills and expertise to manage this solution. For example, in our case, we needed someone with refrigeration knowledge that also knew how to use the tool, and that was a challenge. We also had issues relating to erasing. Sometimes, it kept it in the background and didn't erase it at all. We had to review the entire list to ensure that the item was deleted."

"The technical support is not very good."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect."

"The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that."

"There could be a trial version for students."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

"Regarding improvements, I perceive that the Desktop automation needs enhancements, especially in input stages for dropdown options."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

15%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

See all answers

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

License management is managed by our project manager and marketing manager, who interact directly with SS&C Blue Prism for renewal processes and acquiring licenses for different environments to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

Regarding improvements, I perceive that the Desktop automation needs enhancements, especially in input stages for dropdown options. Additionally, getting started with SS&C Blue Prism developmen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My main use case for SS&C Blue Prism is that I have worked for three clients in finance and customer service-based robots. I have worked for BFSI clients and have built around 30 robots in Ente...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 18% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 13% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 8% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

Lucidchart vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 6% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Pega Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 5% of the time

Appian vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 5% of the time

Worksoft Business Capture vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 4% of the time

Alfresco vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 3% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 3% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

August 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Buyer's Guide

SS&C Blue Prism

July 2026

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

MagicDraw

SS&C AWD

Overview

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.

SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.

What are the key features?

Strong Language Capabilities: Essential for document reading and interpretation.
Straightforward Workflow Design: Provides ease of use for individuals with basic BPM knowledge.
Detailed Automation Building: Design studio allows comprehensive workflow definitions and scenario planning.
Effective Monitoring: Control room supports detailed automation oversight.

What ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Task Automation: Automates repetitive tasks in back-office services.
Enhanced Process Integration: Facilitates automation by integrating data inputs in insurance sectors.
Support for Process Mining: Aids in generative AI initiatives and process transformation.
Complex Project Management: Useful in managing large-scale migration projects.

SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw vs. SS&C Blue Prism

August 2026

Free Report: No Magic MagicDraw vs. SS&C Blue Prism

Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. SS&C Blue Prism and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our No Magic MagicDraw vs. SS&C Blue Prism report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.